Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Steven Gerrard (1996)
A Philosophy of Mathematics Between Two Camps
S. Shapiro (2005)
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
B. Bruin (2007)
Wittgenstein on Circularity in the Frege-Russell Definition of Cardinal NumberPhilosophia Mathematica, 16
P. Hacker (2013)
A Normative Conception of Necessity: Wittgenstein on Necessary Truths of Logic, Mathematics and MetaphysicsFrom ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series, 14
M. Steiner (2008)
Empirical Regularities in Wittgenstein's Philosophy of MathematicsPhilosophia Mathematica, 17
R. Zach (2005)
Book Review: Michael Potter. Reason's Nearest Kin. Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to CarnapNotre Dame J. Formal Log., 46
John Canfield (1981)
Cora Diamond ed., Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939. From the Notes of R.G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees, and Yorick Smythies (Ithaca N.Y.: Cornell U.P.1976). 300 pp.Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11
G. Baker, P. Hacker (1984)
Frege, logical excavations
J. Floyd (2004)
Wittgenstein on Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics
D. Stern (2004)
Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations by David G. Stern
P. Hacker (2002)
Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies
R. Goodstein, L. Wittgenstein, R. Rhees, G. Anscombe (1957)
Remarks on the Foundations of MathematicsThe Mathematical Gazette, 42
M. Marion (1998)
Wittgenstein, finitism, and the foundations of mathematics
William Demopoulos, P. Clark (2007)
The Logicism of Frege, Dedekind, and Russell
P. Trainor (1982)
Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Conversations recorded by Friedrich WaismannThe Modern Schoolman, 59
[The paper focuses on the lectures on the philosophy of mathematics delivered by Wittgenstein in Cambridge in 1939. Only a relatively small number of lectures are discussed, the emphasis falling on understanding Wittgenstein’s views on the most important element of the logicist legacy of Frege and Russell, the definition of number in terms of classes—and, more specifically, by employing the notion of one-to-one correspondence. Since it is clear that Wittgenstein was not satisfied with this definition (and with the overall logically-oriented approach), the aim of the essay is to propose a reading of the lectures able to clarify why that was the case. This reading shows (unsurprisingly) that his better known views on language and mind expressed in Philosophical Investigations illuminate his conception of mathematics.]
Published: Jan 22, 2016
Keywords: Mathematical Proposition; Logicist Definition; Cardinality Operator; Longe Stick; Arithmetical Practice
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.