Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2014)
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
S. Moss (2012)
Solving the Color Incompatibility ProblemJournal of Philosophical Logic, 41
A. Prior (1949)
Determinables, determinates and determinants.Mind; a quarterly review of psychology and philosophy, 58 229
J. Solère (2001)
The Question of Intensive Magnitudes According to Some Jesuits in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth CenturiesThe Monist, 84
G. Moore (1954)
I.—WITTGENSTEIN'S LECTURES IN 1930–33Mind
J. Austin (1980)
Wittgenstein's Solutions to the Color Exclusion ProblemPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 41
P. Carruthers (1990)
The Metaphysics Of The Tractatus
R. Bertolet (1991)
Elementary Prepositions, Independence, and PicturesJournal of Philosophical Research, 16
D. Pears (1987)
The False Prison Volume One
L. Wittgenstein (1929)
Some Remarks on Logical FormAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 9
Per Bech, P. Allerup, Wolfgang Maier, M. Albus, P. Lavori, J. Ayuso (1992)
Insight and illusionBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 161
S. Zabell (1982)
W. E. Johnson's "Sufficientness" PostulateAnnals of Statistics, 10
F. Ramsey, M. Galavotti (1994)
Notes on Philosophy, Probability and MathematicsThe Philosophical Review, 103
D. Sievert (1989)
Another look at Wittgenstein on color exclusionSynthese, 78
Edwin Allaire (1959)
Tractatus 6.3751Analysis, 19
F. Bradley
Appearance and Reality
James Allard (2004)
The Logical Foundations of Bradley's Metaphysics: Judgment, Inference, and Truth
M. Foster (1931)
I.—THE CONCRETE UNIVERSAL: COOK WILSON AND BOSANQUETMind
K. Fine (2011)
AN ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DETERMINATE/DETERMINABLE DISTINCTIONPhilosophical Perspectives, 25
[The paper aims at comparing Wittgenstein’s discussion of color exclusion in his (1929) to Johnson’s doctrine of determinable and determinate expounded in his (1921). I first (Sects. §2–§4) summarize Wittgenstein’s developments about the incompatibility of elementary propositions and about the logic of color statements. In the second part (Sects. §5–§7), I present and discuss Johnson’s doctrine in relation to Wittgenstein’s development. In a third conclusive moment (Sect. §8), drawing on a early work of Prior, I argue that the distinction made by Wittgenstein and Johnson between predication and determination should be looked at from a long term historical perspective.]
Published: Jan 22, 2016
Keywords: Color Statement; Atomic Proposition; Degree Statement; Elementary Proposition; Determinate Character
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.