Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Nguyen, P. Taylor, Robert Redden, R. Ford (2005)
Resistance to Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lab. in a wild Cicer germplasm collectionAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 45
S Pande, KHM Siddique, GK Kishore, B Bayaa, PM Gaur, CLL Gowda, TW Bertag, JH Crouch (2005)
Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology pathogenicity, and disease managementAust J Agric Res, 56
B. Collard, E. Pang, P. Ades, Paul Taylor (2003)
Preliminary investigation of QTLs associated with seedling resistance to ascochyta blight from Cicer echinospermum, a wild relative of chickpeaTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 107
B.C.Y. Collard, E. Pang, Paul Taylor (2003)
Selection of wild Cicer accessions for the generation of mapping populations segregating for resistance to ascochyta blightEuphytica, 130
S. Udupa, M. Baum (2003)
Genetic dissection of pathotype-specific resistance to ascochyta blight disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) using microsatellite markersTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 106
B Collard, PK Ades, ECK Pang, JB Brouwer, PWJ Taylor (2001)
Prospecting for sources of resistance to ascochyta blight in wild Cicer speciesAustralas Plant Path, 30
N. Mallikarjuna (1999)
Ovule and embryo culture to obtain hybrids from interspecific incompatible pollinations in chickpeaEuphytica, 110
TT Nguyen, PWJ Taylor, RJ Redden, R Ford (2005)
Resistance to Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lab. in a wild Cicer germplasm collectionAust J Agric Res, 45
S. Dey, Gurdip Singh (2004)
Resistance to Ascochyta blight in chickpea - Genetic basisEuphytica, 68
G. Ladizinsky, A. Adler (2004)
The origin of chickpea Cicer arietinum L.Euphytica, 25
N. Danehloueipour, G. Yan, H. Clarke, K. Siddique (2006)
Successful stem cutting propagation of chickpea, its wild relatives and their interspecific hybridsAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46
T. Millán, J. Rubio, M. Iruela, K. Daly, J. Cubero, J. Gil (2003)
Markers associated with Ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea and their potential in marker-assisted selectionField Crops Research, 84
K. Singh (1997)
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Field Crops Research, 53
K. Siddique, K. Regan, M. Baker (2004)
New ascochyta blight resistant, high quality kabuli chickpea varieties for Australia
M. Tekeoglu, D. Santra, W. Kaiser, F. Muehlbauer (2000)
Ascochyta Blight Resistance Inheritance in Three Chickpea Recombinant Inbred Line PopulationsCrop Science, 40
M. Reddy, K. Singh (1984)
Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germ plasm accessions for resistance to Ascochyta blightPlant Disease, 68
S. Vir, J. Grewal, V. Gupta (1975)
Inheritance of resistance to Ascochyta blight in chickpeaEuphytica, 24
J. Jinks (1956)
The F2 and backcross generations from a set of diallel crossesHeredity, 10
R. Allard (1956)
The Analysis of Genetic-Environmental Interactions by Means of Diallel Crosses.Genetics, 41 3
Y. Nene, V. Sheila (1992)
Important Disease Problems of Kabuli Chickpea
H. Flandez-Galvez, H. Flandez-Galvez, P. Ades, R. Ford, E. Pang, P. Taylor (2003)
QTL analysis for ascochyta blight resistance in an intraspecific population of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 107
M. Pal, S. Kumar, B. Singh (1999)
Genetics of resistance to Ascochyta blight in chickpeaIndian phytopathology, 52
Mahendra Pal, S. Rajkumar, Jitendra Kumar, Birendra Singh (1986)
Genetics of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Euphytica, 35
M. Hayward (1979)
The application of the diallel cross to outbreeding crop speciesEuphytica, 28
Y. Gan, K. Siddique, W. MacLeod, P. Jayakumar (2006)
Management options for minimizing the damage by ascochyta blight (Ascochyta Rabiei) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Field Crops Research, 97
J. Lichtenzveig, Dani Shtienberg, Hong-Bin Zhang, D. Bonfil, Shahal Abbo (2002)
Biometric Analyses of the Inheritance of Resistance to Didymella rabiei in Chickpea.Phytopathology, 92 4
YL Nene, VK Sheila (1992)
Disease resistance breeding in chickpea
Kenneth Mather, J. Jinks (1972)
Biometrical geneticsHeredity, 29
J. Jinks (1954)
The Analysis of Continuous Variation in a Diallel Cross of Nicotiana Rustica Varieties.Genetics, 39 6
K. Singh, M. Reddy (1983)
Inheritance of Resistance to Ascochyta Blight in Chickpea 1Crop Science, 23
S. Pande, K. Siddique, G. Kishore, B. Bayaa, P. Gaur, C. Gowda, T. Bretag, J. Crouch (2005)
Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology, pathogenicity, and disease managementCrop & Pasture Science, 56
D. Santra, M. Tekeoglu, M. Ratnaparkhe, W. Kaiser, F. Muehlbauer (2000)
Identification and Mapping of QTLs Conferring Resistance to Ascochyta Blight in ChickpeaCrop Science, 40
B. Hayman (1954)
The Theory and Analysis of Diallel Crosses.Genetics, 39 6
B. Hayman (1954)
The Theory and Analysis of Diallel Crosses. III.Genetics, 45 2
Ascochyta blight is a major fungal disease affecting chickpea production worldwide. The genetics of ascochyta blight resistance was studied in five 5 × 5 half-diallel cross sets involving seven genotypes of chickpea (ICC 3996, Almaz, Lasseter, Kaniva, 24B-Isoline, IG 9337 and Kimberley Large), three accessions of Cicer reticulatum (ILWC 118, ILWC 139 and ILWC 184) and one accession of C. echinospermum (ILWC 181) under field conditions. Both F1 and F2 generations were used in the diallel analysis. The disease was rated in the field using a 1–9 scale. Almaz, ICC 3996 and ILWC 118 were the most resistant (rated 3–4) and all other genotypes were susceptible (rated 6–9) to ascochyta blight. Estimates of genetic parameters, following Hayman’s method, showed significant additive and dominant gene actions. The analysis also revealed the involvement of both major and minor genes. Susceptibility was dominant over resistance to ascochyta blight. The recessive alleles were concentrated in the two resistant chickpea parents ICC 3996 and Almaz, and one C. reticulatum genotype ILWC 118. The wild Cicer accessions may have different major or minor resistant genes compared to the cultivated chickpea. High narrow-sense heritability (ranging from 82% to 86% for F1 generations, and 43% to 63% for F2 generations) indicates that additive gene effects were more important than non-additive gene effects in the inheritance of the trait and greater genetic gain can be achieved in the breeding of resistant chickpea cultivars by using carefully selected parental genotypes.
Euphytica – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 9, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.