Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Correction to: A Tale of Two Deficits: Causality and Care in Medical AI

Correction to: A Tale of Two Deficits: Causality and Care in Medical AI Philosophy & Technology (2019) 32:769–770 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00375-6 CORRECTION Open Access Correction to: A Tale of Two Deficits: Causality and Care in Medical AI Melvin Chen Published online: 3 September 2019 The Author(s) 2019 Correction to: Philosophy & Technology https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00359-6 The original version of this article unfortunately contains an unconverted data in footnotes 5, 9 and 13. The correct presentation of data should be. Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: ~Q C: ∴ ~P (modus tollens rule of inference) Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: ((Q.R) ⊃ S) P3: R C: ∴ (P ⊃ S) Proofofvalidity: 1: (P ⊃ Q) 2: ((Q.R) ⊃ S) 3: R (P ⊃ S) (block off conclusion and assume the negation of C) 4: asm: ~(P ⊃ S) 5: ∴ P(from 4) The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00359-6 * Melvin Chen melvinchen@ntu.edu.sg Nanyang Technological University, 26 Nanyang Avenue, Hall 8, Blk 44 #01-819, Singapore S639812, Singapore 770 M. Chen 6: ∴ ~S (from 4) 7: ∴ Q (from 1 and 5) (modus ponens) 8: ∴ (Q.R) (from 3 and 7) 9: ∴ S (from 2 and 8) (modus ponens) 10: ∴ (P ⊃ S) (from 4; 6 contradicts 9) (reductio ad absurdum)(QED) Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: (Q ⊃ R) P3: (P ≡ S) C: ∴ (S ⊃ R) Proofofvalidity: 1: (P ⊃ Q) 2: (Q ⊃ R) 3: (P ≡ S) (S ⊃ R) (block off conclusion and assume the negation of C) 4: asm: ~(S ⊃ R) 5: ∴ S(from 4) 6: ∴ ~R (from 4) 7: ∴ (P ⊃ R) (from 1 and 2) (hypothetical syllogism) 8: ∴ ~P (from 6 and 7) (modus tollens) 9: ∴ (S ⊃ P) (from 3) 10: ∴ ~S (from 8 and 9) (modus tollens) 11: ∴ (S ⊃ R) (from 4; 5 contradicts 10) (reductio ad absurdum)(QED) The original article has been corrected. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and repro- duction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophy & Technology Springer Journals

Correction to: A Tale of Two Deficits: Causality and Care in Medical AI

Philosophy & Technology , Volume 32 (4) – Sep 3, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/correction-to-a-tale-of-two-deficits-causality-and-care-in-medical-ai-8sNwuUEYr7
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by The Author(s)
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy of Technology
ISSN
2210-5433
eISSN
2210-5441
DOI
10.1007/s13347-019-00375-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Philosophy & Technology (2019) 32:769–770 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00375-6 CORRECTION Open Access Correction to: A Tale of Two Deficits: Causality and Care in Medical AI Melvin Chen Published online: 3 September 2019 The Author(s) 2019 Correction to: Philosophy & Technology https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00359-6 The original version of this article unfortunately contains an unconverted data in footnotes 5, 9 and 13. The correct presentation of data should be. Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: ~Q C: ∴ ~P (modus tollens rule of inference) Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: ((Q.R) ⊃ S) P3: R C: ∴ (P ⊃ S) Proofofvalidity: 1: (P ⊃ Q) 2: ((Q.R) ⊃ S) 3: R (P ⊃ S) (block off conclusion and assume the negation of C) 4: asm: ~(P ⊃ S) 5: ∴ P(from 4) The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00359-6 * Melvin Chen melvinchen@ntu.edu.sg Nanyang Technological University, 26 Nanyang Avenue, Hall 8, Blk 44 #01-819, Singapore S639812, Singapore 770 M. Chen 6: ∴ ~S (from 4) 7: ∴ Q (from 1 and 5) (modus ponens) 8: ∴ (Q.R) (from 3 and 7) 9: ∴ S (from 2 and 8) (modus ponens) 10: ∴ (P ⊃ S) (from 4; 6 contradicts 9) (reductio ad absurdum)(QED) Formally: P1: (P ⊃ Q) P2: (Q ⊃ R) P3: (P ≡ S) C: ∴ (S ⊃ R) Proofofvalidity: 1: (P ⊃ Q) 2: (Q ⊃ R) 3: (P ≡ S) (S ⊃ R) (block off conclusion and assume the negation of C) 4: asm: ~(S ⊃ R) 5: ∴ S(from 4) 6: ∴ ~R (from 4) 7: ∴ (P ⊃ R) (from 1 and 2) (hypothetical syllogism) 8: ∴ ~P (from 6 and 7) (modus tollens) 9: ∴ (S ⊃ P) (from 3) 10: ∴ ~S (from 8 and 9) (modus tollens) 11: ∴ (S ⊃ R) (from 4; 5 contradicts 10) (reductio ad absurdum)(QED) The original article has been corrected. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and repro- duction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Journal

Philosophy & TechnologySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 3, 2019

There are no references for this article.