Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Convenience Voting and TechnologyVoting Technology, Security, and Privacy Concerns

Convenience Voting and Technology: Voting Technology, Security, and Privacy Concerns [Previous chapters have firmly establishedthat military and overseas voters have traditionally experienced considerable trouble completing the voting process, which is reflected, for example, in the low ballot return rates described in Chapter 4. These difficulties have been primarily attributed to the voting time line; that is, because of their geographical distance from their local election officials (LEOs) as well as a reliance on traditional postal methods, voters were often unable to receive a blank ballot and/or return a voted ballot by the appropriate deadline. In short, it simply took too long to vote. As described in Chapter 3, since 2000, a series of legislative fixes at the state level and the passage of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act in 2009 at the federal level have been implemented in order to reduce the hurdles individuals face when voting, for example, extending the time line for voting to a mandatory 45 days.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Convenience Voting and TechnologyVoting Technology, Security, and Privacy Concerns

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/convenience-voting-and-technology-voting-technology-security-and-X6jQGSVLxS

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
ISBN
978-1-349-48546-8
Pages
135 –169
DOI
10.1057/9781137391070_7
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Previous chapters have firmly establishedthat military and overseas voters have traditionally experienced considerable trouble completing the voting process, which is reflected, for example, in the low ballot return rates described in Chapter 4. These difficulties have been primarily attributed to the voting time line; that is, because of their geographical distance from their local election officials (LEOs) as well as a reliance on traditional postal methods, voters were often unable to receive a blank ballot and/or return a voted ballot by the appropriate deadline. In short, it simply took too long to vote. As described in Chapter 3, since 2000, a series of legislative fixes at the state level and the passage of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act in 2009 at the federal level have been implemented in order to reduce the hurdles individuals face when voting, for example, extending the time line for voting to a mandatory 45 days.]

Published: Oct 30, 2015

Keywords: Voter Turnout; Local Election; Vote Process; Secure Socket Layer; Transport Layer Security

There are no references for this article.