Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Dansky, D. Kilpatrick (1997)
Effects of sexual harassment.
Theresa Glomb, L. Munson, C. Hulin, M. Bergman, F. Drasgow (1999)
Structural equation models of sexual harassment: longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations.The Journal of applied psychology, 84 1
D. Terpstra, D. Baker (1987)
A hierarchy of sexual harassment.The Journal of psychology, 121 6
R. Katz, R. Hannon, Leslie Whitten (1996)
Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassmentSex Roles, 34
G. Timmerman, C. Bajema (1999)
Sexual harassment in northwest Europe: A cross-cultural comparisonEuropean Journal of Women's Studies, 6
L. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow, C. Hulin, M. Gelfand, M. Gelfand, V. Magley, V. Magley (1997)
Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model.The Journal of applied psychology, 82 4
P. Glick, S. T. Fiske (1997)
Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward womenPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
Caroline Cochran, P. Frazier, A. Olson (1997)
Predictors of Responses to Unwanted Sexual AttentionPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
J. Matchen, E. DeSouza (2000)
The sexual harassment of faculty members by studentsSex Roles, 42
P. Glick, S. Fiske (1997)
Hostile and Benevolent SexismPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
Elizabeth Grauerholz (1989)
Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority, and gender in a university settingSex Roles, 21
L. Fitzgerald (1990)
Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct.
S. Tangri, M. Burt, L. Johnson (1982)
Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory ModelsJournal of Social Issues, 38
L. Fitzgerald, M. Gelfand, F. Drasgow (1995)
Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric AdvancesBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
J. Pryor, Christine LaVite, Lynnette Stoller (1993)
A Social Psychological Analysis of Sexual Harassment: The Person/Situation InteractionJournal of Vocational Behavior, 42
Adena Meyers, J. Pryor (2000)
Men Who Sexually Harass Women
J. B. Pryor, A. B. Meyers (2000)
Serial offenders: Current thought, recent findings, unusual syndromes
Michela Larocca, J. Kromrey (1999)
The Perception of Sexual Harassment in Higher Education: Impact of Gender and AttractivenessSex Roles, 40
S. Coster, S. Estes, C. Mueller (1999)
Routine Activities and Sexual Harassment in the WorkplaceWork and Occupations, 26
K. Rospenda, J. Richman, Stephanie Nawyn (1998)
DOING POWERGender & Society, 12
K. McKinney (1992)
Contrapower sexual harassment: The effects of student sex and type of behavior on faculty perceptionsSex Roles, 27
L. Fitzgerald, S. Shullman, Nancy Bailey, M. Richards, Janice Swecker, Yael Gold, M. Ormerod, L. Weitzman (1988)
The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32
G. Powell (1986)
Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassmentSex Roles, 14
M. Hay, Timothy Elig (1999)
The 1995 Department of Defense Sexual Harassment Survey: Overview and MethodologyMilitary Psychology, 11
M. Kelley, Bethany Parsons (2000)
Sexual Harassment in the 1990sThe Journal of Higher Education, 71
L. F. Fitzgerald (1990)
Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus
Katherine Benson (1984)
Comment on Crocker's "An Analysis of University Definitions of Sexual Harassment"Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9
L. Fitzgerald, Alayne Ormerod (1991)
Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Influence of Gender and Academic ContextPsychology of Women Quarterly, 15
L. Fitzgerald, L. Weitzman, Yael Gold, M. Ormerod (1988)
Academic Harassment: Sex and Denial in Scholarly GarbPsychology of Women Quarterly, 12
M. Gelfand, L. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow (1995)
The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and SettingsJournal of Vocational Behavior, 47
K. McKinney (1994)
Sexual harassment and college faculty membersDeviant Behavior, 15
C. Waldo, Jennifer Berdahl, L. Fitzgerald (1998)
Are Men Sexually Harassed? If So, by Whom?Law and Human Behavior, 22
P. Glick, S. Fiske (1996)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70
Maria Rotundo, Dung-Hanh Nguyen, P. Sackett (2001)
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 5
Melora Sundt (1996)
Understanding the Characteristics of the Sexual Harasser.Initiatives, 57
B. A. Gutek, R. S. Done (2001)
Handbook of the psychology of women and gender
L. Munson, C. Hulin, F. Drasgow (2000)
LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF DISPOSITIONAL INFLUENCES AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT: EFFECTS ON JOB AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMESPersonnel Psychology, 53
P. Frazier, Caroline Cochran, A. Olson (1995)
Social Science Research on Lay Definitions of Sexual HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 51
W. O’Donohue (1997)
Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment.
J. Pryor, N. Whalen (1997)
A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs.
James Matchen, E. DeSouza (2000)
Brief Report: The Sexual Harassment of Faculty Members by StudentsSex Roles, 42
Jeremy Blumenthal (1998)
The Reasonable Woman Standard: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual HarassmentLaw and Human Behavior, 22
S. Wheelan, Anthony Verdi (1992)
Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact?Sex Roles, 27
L. Fitzgerald, Nicole Buchanan, Linda Collinsworth, V. Magley, Alexandra Ramos (1999)
Junk logic: The abuse defense in sexual harassment litigation.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5
Lynne Carroll, Kathryn Ellis (1989)
Faculty Attitudes Towards Sexual Harassment: Survey Results, Survey Process.Initiatives, 52
L. Fitzgerald, S. Swan, V. Magley (1997)
But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women.
D. Dillman (1979)
Mail and telephone surveys : the total design methodSocial Forces, 11
K. M. Rospenda, J. A. Richman, S. J. Nawyn (1998)
Doing power: The confluence of gender, race, and class in contra-power sexual harassmentGender and Society, 12
B. Gutek (1987)
Sex and the workplace
J. Pryor (1987)
Sexual harassment proclivities in menSex Roles, 17
C. Veit, J. Ware (1983)
The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populationsJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51
J. B. Pryor (1998)
Sexuality-related measures: A compendium
C. West, S. Fensternmaker (1997)
Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates
K. McKinney (1990)
Sexual harassment of university faculty by colleagues and studentsSex Roles, 23
G. Timmerman, C. Bajema (1999)
Sexual Harassment in Northwest EuropeEuropean Journal of Women's Studies, 6
We conducted two studies to shed light on contrapower sexual harassment in an academic setting. In the first study, we surveyed a random sample of 158 college students (83.4% White) concerning their potentially sexually harassing behaviors toward professors, sexist attitudes toward women, and proclivities to harass sexually. Almost one third of the students reported having sexually harassed a professor at least once. Male students were more likely than female students to be the perpetrators. In the second study, all tenured and tenure-track faculty were mailed a survey; 209 professors (88.9% White) completed the survey concerning their experiences with sexual harassment from students as well as their coping responses, definitions of sexual harassment, and reactions to hypothetical scenarios. Over one half of the professors reported having been at least once sexually harassed by students. Although male and female professors experienced similar rates of sexual harassment from students, the psychological outcome was worse for women than for men. Male and female professors defined sexual harassment similarly. However, when more contextual information was provided in the hypothetical scenarios, several gender differences emerged. In addition, men and women used both internal and external coping responses to different types of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment as both a tool and a result of male dominance in society is discussed.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 28, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.