Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Wullstein, E. Gross (2003)
Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 90
F. Catena, S. Saverio, M. Kelly, W. Biffl, L. Ansaloni, V. Mandalà, G. Velmahos, M. Sartelli, G. Tugnoli, M. Lupo, S. Mandalà, A. Pinna, P. Sugarbaker, H. Goor, E. Moore, J. Jeekel (2011)
Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency SurgeryWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES, 6
B. Ghosheh, J. Salameh (2007)
Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: Review of 1061 casesSurgical Endoscopy, 21
M. Khaikin, N. Schneidereit, Susan Cera, Daniel Sands, Jonathan Efron, E. Weiss, J. Nogueras, A. Vernava, S. Wexner (2007)
Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost-effectivenessSurgical Endoscopy, 21
C. Gutt, T. Oniu, P. Schemmer, A. Mehrabi, M. Büchler (2004)
Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 18
D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P. Clavien (2004)
Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a SurveyAnnals of Surgery, 240
F. Grafen, V. Neuhaus, O. Schöb, M. Turina (2009)
Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospitalLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 395
Taylor Coe, D. Chang, J. Sicklick (2015)
Small bowel volvulus in the adult populace of the United States: results from a population-based study.American journal of surgery, 210 2
S. Davies, Jake Gillen, Christopher Guidry, T. Newhook, Nicolas Pope, T. Hranjec, R. Sawyer, P. Hallowell (2014)
A Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic and Open Adhesiolysis at a Tertiary Care CenterThe American Surgeon, 80
J. Byrne, F. Saleh, L. Ambrosini, F. Quereshy, T. Jackson, A. Okrainec (2015)
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomesSurgical Endoscopy, 29
M. Malangoni (2011)
Is it time to recast the principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis?World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES, 6
K. Kelly, J. Iannuzzi, A. Rickles, V. Garimella, J. Monson, F. Fleming (2013)
Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complicationsSurgical Endoscopy, 28
Jongha Park, S. Ahmadi, E. Streja, M. Molnar, K. Flegal, D. Gillen, C. Kovesdy, K. Kalantar-Zadeh (2014)
Obesity paradox in end-stage kidney disease patients.Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 56 4
G. Mancini, G. Petroski, Wen-Chieh Lin, E. Sporn, B. Miedema, K. Thaler (2008)
Nationwide impact of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions in the management of intestinal obstruction in the US.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 207 4
Joyce Zhang, J. Matelski, R. Gandhi, T. Jackson, D. Urbach, P. Cram (2018)
Can Patient Selection Explain the Obesity Paradox in Orthopaedic Hip Surgery? An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP RegistryClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 476
S. Daly, A. Popoff, L. Fogg, Amanda Francescatti, J. Myers, K. Millikan, D. Deziel, M. Luu (2014)
Minimally Invasive Technique Leads to Decreased Morbidity and Mortality in Small Bowel Resections Compared to an Open Technique: An ACS-NSQIP Identified Target for ImprovementJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 18
Ming-zhe Li, L. Lian, Long-bin Xiao, Wen-hui Wu, Yu-Long He, Xin-ming Song (2012)
Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of surgery, 204 5
SharmaRohit, ReddySubhash, ThomanDavid, GrottsJonathan, FerrignoLisa (2015)
Laparoscopic Versus Open Bowel Resection in Emergency Small Bowel Obstruction: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program DatabaseJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 25
Kevin Johnson, A. Chapital, K. Harold, Marianne Merritt, Daniel Johnson (2012)
Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: Evaluating the need for resectionThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 72
P. Fuchshuber, W. Greif, Chantal Tidwell, Michael Klemm, Cheryl Frydel, Abdul Wali, Efren Rosas, Molly Clopp (2012)
The power of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--achieving a zero pneumonia rate in general surgery patients.The Permanente journal, 16 1
Maja Jeppesen, Mai-Britt Tolstrup, Sara Watt, I. Gögenur (2016)
Risk factors affecting morbidity and mortality following emergency laparotomy for small bowel obstruction: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of surgery, 28
J. Schiffmann, P. Karakiewicz, M. Rink, L. Manka, G. Salomon, D. Tilki, L. Budäus, R. Pompe, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, A. Haese*, P. Hammerer, H. Huland, M. Graefen, P. Tennstedt (2018)
Obesity paradox in prostate cancer: increased body mass index was associated with decreased risk of metastases after surgery in 13,667 patientsWorld Journal of Urology, 36
R. Behman, A. Nathens, J. Byrne, Stephanie Mason, N. Hong, P. Karanicolas (2017)
Laparoscopic Surgery for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Bowel Injury: A Population-based Analysis of 8584 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 266
C. Gutt, C. Schmedt, T. Schmandra, O. Heupel, P. Schemmer, M. Büchler (2004)
Insufflation profile and body position influence portal venous blood flow during pneumoperitoneumSurgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 18
J. Margenthaler, W. Longo, Katherine Virgo, F. Johnson, E. Grossmann, Tracy Schifftner, W. Henderson, S. Khuri (2006)
Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes Following Surgery for Small Bowel ObstructionAnnals of Surgery, 243
Rohit Sharma, Subhash Reddy, D. Thoman, J. Grotts, L. Ferrigno (2015)
Laparoscopic Versus Open Bowel Resection in Emergency Small Bowel Obstruction: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 25 8
John Scott, Olubode Olufajo, G. Brat, John Rose, C. Zogg, A. Haider, A. Salim, J. Havens (2016)
Use of National Burden to Define Operative Emergency General Surgery.JAMA surgery, 151 6
M. Al-Temimi, M. Griffee, Toby Enniss, Robert Preston, D. Vargo, S. Overton, E. Kimball, R. Barton, R. Nirula (2012)
When is death inevitable after emergency laparotomy? Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 215 4
Sanae Hamaguchi, M. Tsuchihashi-Makaya, S. Kinugawa, D. Goto, T. Yokota, K. Goto, S. Yamada, H. Yokoshiki, A. Takeshita, H. Tsutsui (2010)
Body mass index is an independent predictor of long-term outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure in Japan.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 74 12
D. O'Connor, D. Winter (2010)
Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: a protective role implied for laparoscopy?Annals of surgery, 251 6
S. Lombardo, K. Baum, J. Filho, R. Nirula (2014)
Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysisJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76
M. Sajid, A. Khawaja, P. Sains, K. Singh, M. Baig (2016)
A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction.American journal of surgery, 212 1
N. Symons, K. Moorthy, A. Almoudaris, A. Bottle, P. Aylin, C. Vincent, O. Faiz (2013)
Mortality in high‐risk emergency general surgical admissionsBritish Journal of Surgery, 100
Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) continues to be a common indication for acute care surgery. While open procedures are still widely used for treatment, laparoscopic procedures may have important advantages in certain patient populations. We aim to analyze differences in outcomes between the two for treatment of bowel obstruction. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to find patients that underwent emergent or non-elective surgery for SBO. Propensity matching was used to create comparable groups. Logistic regression was used to assess differences in the primary outcome of interest, return to operating room, and morbidity and mortality outcomes. Logistic regression was also used to assess the contribution of various preoperative demographic and comorbidity characteristics to 30-day mortality. Results A total of 24,028 patients underwent surgery for SBO from 2005 to 2011. Of those, 3391 were laparoscopic. Pro- pensity matching resulted in 6782 matched patients. Laparoscopic cases had significantly decreased odds of experiencing any morbidity and wound complications compared to open cases in bowel-resection and adhesiolysis-only cases. There was no significant difference found for odds of returning to operating room. Laparoscopic cases resulted in significantly shorter hospital stays than open cases (7.18 vs.10.84 days, p <
Surgical Endoscopy – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 4, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.