Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comment on ‘Parkin et al. reconsidered’ by Rossmann

Comment on ‘Parkin et al. reconsidered’ by Rossmann This article considers the study reported by Rossmann (1983) in which a failure to replicate the findings of Parkin, Lewinsohn and Folkard (1982) is reported. It is argued that Rossmann's findings could be attributed to methodological differences and, as such, do not constitute a replication failure. Guidelines for further replication attempts are offered. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Research Springer Journals

Comment on ‘Parkin et al. reconsidered’ by Rossmann

Psychological Research , Volume 45 (4) – Aug 24, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/comment-on-parkin-et-al-reconsidered-by-rossmann-7n0q051Qug

References (10)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Psychology; Psychology Research
ISSN
0340-0727
eISSN
1430-2772
DOI
10.1007/BF00309714
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article considers the study reported by Rossmann (1983) in which a failure to replicate the findings of Parkin, Lewinsohn and Folkard (1982) is reported. It is argued that Rossmann's findings could be attributed to methodological differences and, as such, do not constitute a replication failure. Guidelines for further replication attempts are offered.

Journal

Psychological ResearchSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 24, 2004

There are no references for this article.