Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G Dicker (2008)
Kant's refutation of idealismNoûs, 42
D. Engelbart (1988)
A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellectComputer Supported Cooperative Work
(1970)
< 1956 > ) . Formale Logik ( 3 . ed . )
van Bruggen, P. Kirschner, Wmg Jochems (2002)
External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive loadLearning and Instruction, 12
N. Cowan (2001)
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacityBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 24
S. Shum (2003)
The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization
A. Liddo, S. Shum, P. McAndrew, R. Farrow (2012)
The open education evidence hub: a collective intelligence tool for evidence based policy
JC Bean (2011)
Engaging ideas: the professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series)
J Smed, T Kaukoranta, H Hakonen (2002)
Aspects of networking in multiplayer computer games. [Article]Electronic Library, 20
Formale Logik (3. ed.). Freiburg i. Br
T Gelder (2013)
Encyclopedia of the mind
M. Hoffmann, J. Borenstein (2013)
Understanding Ill-Structured Engineering Ethics Problems Through a Collaborative Learning and Argument Visualization ApproachScience and Engineering Ethics, 20
A. Moktefi, Sun-Joo Shin (2012)
A History of Logic Diagrams
H. Rittel, M. Webber (1973)
Dilemmas in a general theory of planningPolicy Sciences, 4
(1994)
Hyperproof (CSLI Lecture notes no. 42)
A Moktefi, S-J Shin (2012)
Logic. A history of its central concepts
Theresa Senft (2003)
The Cathedral and the Bazaar
M. Hoffmann (2013)
Why the presentation of arguments in logical form has advantages
J Sweller (2010)
Cognitive load theory
(1996)
Logical reasoning with diagrams (studies in logic and computation)
(1998)
Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Nach der ersten (= A , 1781) und zweiten (= B, 1787) Originalausgabe hg. v. Jens Timmermann)
A. Okada, S. Shum, T. Sherborne (2014)
Knowledge Cartography
H Putnam (1981)
Reason, truth and history
M. Croy (2010)
Teaching the Practical Relevance of Propositional LogicTeaching Philosophy, 33
M. Hoffmann (2007)
Logical argument mapping: a cognitive-change-based method for building common ground
Sun-Joo Shin (2002)
The Iconic Logic of Peirce's Graphs
J. Sweller (2010)
Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances
(2004)
Philosophisches Argumentieren. Eine Einführung (Beck'sche Reihe 1607)
(1985)
Epistemic dependence
JF Sowa (2000)
Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations
G. Mann (1994)
The Quark and the Jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex
J. Bruggen, H. Boshuizen, P. Kirschner (2003)
A Cognitive Framework for Cooperative Problem Solving with Argument Visualization
D. Walton, C. Reed, Fabrizio Macagno (2008)
Argumentation Schemes
J. Conklin (2005)
Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems
L Euler (1768)
Lettres à une Princesse d'Allemagne
JW McAllister (2003)
Effective complexity as a measure of information content. [Article]Philosophy of Science, 70
Erling Skorpen (1968)
Kant's Refutation of IdealismJournal of the History of Philosophy, 6
J. Bean, M. Weimer (2011)
Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom
H. Prakken, G. Vreeswijk (2001)
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
M. Huemer (2000)
Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat ArgumentPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61
(1909)
( Fragments on existential graphs ) : MS 514 ; transcription by Michael Balat , with commentary by John F
Iyad Rahwan, Fouad Zablith, C. Reed (2007)
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument WebArtif. Intell., 171
C. Ash (2010)
From Simplicity to ComplexityScience, 329
D. Billings (2008)
Argument mapping.Journal of continuing education in nursing, 39 6
G. Miller (1956)
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological review, 63 2
Leonhard Euler
Lettres à une princesse d'Allemagne sur divers sujets de physique & de philosophie, 2
J. McAllister (2003)
Effective Complexity as a Measure of Information ContentPhilosophy of Science, 70
DC Engelbart (1963)
Vistas in information handling
M. ALMEIDA (1977)
DiagramsHAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4
D. Roberts (2009)
The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce
Oliver Scheuer, Frank Loll, Niels Pinkwart, B. McLaren (2010)
Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the artInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5
A. Brueckner (1983)
Transcendental Arguments INoûs, 17
E. Raymond (1998)
The cathedral and the bazaarKnowledge, Technology & Policy, 12
K. Ericsson, W. Kintsch (1995)
Long-term working memory.Psychological review, 102 2
B. Edmonds, R. Meyer (2013)
Simulating Social Complexity: A Handbook
A. Musgrave (2012)
Deductivism Surpassed: Or, Foxing in its Margins?Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43
H Prakken, G Vreeswijk (2001)
Handbook of philosophical logic
S. Toulmin (2003)
The Layout of Arguments
P. Guyer (2006)
The Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy
(2013)
Desirable difficulties perspective on learning
Jouni Smed, T. Kaukoranta, H. Hakonen (2002)
Aspects of networking in multiplayer computer gamesElectron. Libr., 20
Stuart Shapiro (2001)
Book Reviews: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations
Jin-Tan Yang (2003)
Visualizing Argumentation -Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-MakingJ. Educ. Technol. Soc., 6
(2011)
Philosophy of complex systems (Handbook of the philosophy of science; v
Technology is not only an object of philosophical reflection but also something that can change this reflection. This paper discusses the potential of computer-supported argument visualization tools for coping with the complexity of philosophical arguments. I will show, in particular, how the interactive and web-based argument mapping software “AGORA-net” can change the practice of philosophical reflection, communication, and collaboration. AGORA-net allows the graphical representation of complex argumentations in logical form and the synchronous and asynchronous collaboration on those “argument maps” on the internet. Web-based argument mapping can overcome limits of space, time, and access, and it can empower users from all over the world to clarify their reasoning and to participate in deliberation and debate. Collaborative and web-based argument mapping tools such as AGORA-net can change the practice of arguing in two dimensions. First, arguing on web-based argument maps in both collaborative and adversarial form can lead to a fundamental shift in the way arguments are produced and debated. It can provide an alternative to the traditional four-step process of writing, publishing, debating, and responding in new writing with its clear distinction between individual and social activities by a process in which these four steps happen virtually simultaneously, and individual and social activities become more closely intertwined. Second, by replacing the linear form of arguments through graphical representations of networks of inferential relations which can grow over time in an infinite space, these tools do not only allow a clear visualization of structures and relations, but also forms of collaboration in which, for example, participants work on different “construction zones” of larger argument maps, or debates are performed at specific points of disagreement on those maps. I introduce the term synergetic logosymphysis (defined as a process in which an argumentative structure grows in a collaborative effort) to describe a practice that combines these two dimensions of collaborative- and web-based argument mapping.
Philosophy & Technology – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 17, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.