Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Challenges of Conserving Blue Bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Outside the Protected Areas of Nepal

Challenges of Conserving Blue Bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Outside the Protected Areas of Nepal Blue bull, or ‘Nilgai’ (Boselaphus tragocamelus, Pallas, 1766) is the sole member of its genus. It is endemic to the Indian subcontinent and while there are major populations in northern India, there are also smaller populations in Nepal and Pakistan. It is now extinct in Bangladesh. The Nepalese population is sparsely distributed, mostly in the lowland Terai areas, and outside of Nepal’s protected area network. Conflict with local farming communities because of crop damage by nilgai has created conservation challenges and our aim was to document the distribution of nilgai and to explore the conflict between nilgai and the human population in lowland Nepal. Our study focused on the Rupendehi District of Nepal during March to August 2016, where a total of 303 nilgai were counted. The highest population of nilgai was in the community forests and lowest in areas of cultivated land. The distribution pattern of nilgai was clumped, with an average herd size of 5.6 individuals per herd. Crop raiding damage by nilgai created a serious problem in the municipalities, known as village development committees which are located close to potential nilgai habitat. The projected crop yield loss due to nilgai in the study area was NRs (Nepali Rupees) 7,275,507 (US$ 68,633) from March 2015 to March 2016. Vegetable and pulses crops were those most damaged by nilgai, contributing to 14.48 and 10.38% of the total losses, respectively. The local people held mixed perceptions of nilgai. The most negative views were held by people who had experienced some extent of crop loss. Suitable protective measures to minimize crop loss are required such as changing cropping patterns and crop composition, particularly cultivation of medicinal plants are suggested as priorities in highly effective zone. The study noted that there were many threats to nilgai including illegal hunting, poisoning, electric fences and habitat deterioration. Successful nilgai conservation will require further education, gaining support from local people and possibly new crop management techniques. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Proceedings of the Zoological Society Springer Journals

Challenges of Conserving Blue Bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Outside the Protected Areas of Nepal

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/challenges-of-conserving-blue-bull-boselaphus-tragocamelus-outside-the-7fCTBXJB25
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Zoological Society, Kolkata, India
Subject
Life Sciences; Life Sciences, general; Zoology; Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Biodiversity; Conservation Biology/Ecology
ISSN
0373-5893
eISSN
0974-6919
DOI
10.1007/s12595-017-0218-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Blue bull, or ‘Nilgai’ (Boselaphus tragocamelus, Pallas, 1766) is the sole member of its genus. It is endemic to the Indian subcontinent and while there are major populations in northern India, there are also smaller populations in Nepal and Pakistan. It is now extinct in Bangladesh. The Nepalese population is sparsely distributed, mostly in the lowland Terai areas, and outside of Nepal’s protected area network. Conflict with local farming communities because of crop damage by nilgai has created conservation challenges and our aim was to document the distribution of nilgai and to explore the conflict between nilgai and the human population in lowland Nepal. Our study focused on the Rupendehi District of Nepal during March to August 2016, where a total of 303 nilgai were counted. The highest population of nilgai was in the community forests and lowest in areas of cultivated land. The distribution pattern of nilgai was clumped, with an average herd size of 5.6 individuals per herd. Crop raiding damage by nilgai created a serious problem in the municipalities, known as village development committees which are located close to potential nilgai habitat. The projected crop yield loss due to nilgai in the study area was NRs (Nepali Rupees) 7,275,507 (US$ 68,633) from March 2015 to March 2016. Vegetable and pulses crops were those most damaged by nilgai, contributing to 14.48 and 10.38% of the total losses, respectively. The local people held mixed perceptions of nilgai. The most negative views were held by people who had experienced some extent of crop loss. Suitable protective measures to minimize crop loss are required such as changing cropping patterns and crop composition, particularly cultivation of medicinal plants are suggested as priorities in highly effective zone. The study noted that there were many threats to nilgai including illegal hunting, poisoning, electric fences and habitat deterioration. Successful nilgai conservation will require further education, gaining support from local people and possibly new crop management techniques.

Journal

Proceedings of the Zoological Society – Springer Journals

Published: May 18, 2017

References

  • Study on relative abundance and distribution of tiger prey base (ungulates) in Khata Corridor Bardia National Park. Kathmandu University
    Adhikari, S; Khadka, A
  • Blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Lumbini: A world heritage site of Nepal
    Aryal, A
  • Assessment of crop damage by protected wild mammalian herbivores on the western boundary of Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve (TATR), Central India
    Bayani, A; Tiwade, D; Dongre, A; Dongre, AP; Phatak, R; Watve, A
  • A study on the ecology of nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus Pallas) and its status as an unconventional pest of agriculture in and around Beer-Stony Reserve Forest, Haryana, India
    Chopra, G; Rai, D
  • Assessment of wild ungulates in the Karnali flood plain of Bardia National Park, Nepal
    Gautam, DN
  • Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda
    Hill, CM
  • Farmers’ perspectives of conflict at the wildlife–agriculture boundary: some lessons learned from African subsistence farmers
    Hill, CM
  • Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system
    Jenkins, CN; Joppa, L
  • Group size and age sex composition of three major ungulate species in Gir Lion Sanctuary, Gujrat India
    Khan, JA; Chellam, R; Johnsingh, AJT
  • Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
    Leslie, DM
  • Global protected areas and IUCN designations: Do the categories match the conditions?
    Leroux, SJ; Krawchuk, MA; Schmiegelow, F; Cumming, SG; Lisgo, K; Anderson, LG; Petkova, M
  • Bats over nature: The science and politics of conservation in India
    Madhusudan, MD; Mishra, C
  • Indigenous measures used to curb the menace of Bluebull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in district Rajsamand, Rajasthan, India
    Meena, RP; Meena, BL; Nandal, U; Meena, CL
  • Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park
    Naughton-Treves, L
  • Fundamentals of ecology
    Odum, EP
  • The deer and the tiger. A study of Wildlife in India
    Schaller, GB
  • How representative is the protected areas system of Nepal? A gap analysis based on geophysical and biological features
    Shrestha, UB; Shrestha, S; Chaudhary, P; Chaudhary, RP