Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[This scenario arises when tagged animals die through natural mortality and possibly exploitation (e.g., hunting and fisheries), and their tags are recovered. A wide variety of models for both exploited and unexploited populations are considered depending on what underlying population assumptions are made, the first being time dependence for both the survival and tag–recovery probabilities. In the exploited case, reward and solicited tags are introduced with commercial fisheries having a special mention. Instantaneous models are included based on Poisson processes and, later, catch-age data. Departures from the underlying assumptions are considered. In endeavoring to separate estimates of natural and exploitation mortality, three types of hypotheses are considered, one, for example, being the additive hypothesis. Other special cases are Ricker’s two-release method, a model with constant survival and time-dependent recovery probabilities, and various age-specific and other models. Departures from the assumptions such as heterogeneity lead to the methods of mixtures and random effects.]
Published: Aug 14, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.