Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Delden, R. Graaf (2017)
International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving HumansJAMA, 317
Alice Hawkins, Kieran O’Doherty (2010)
Biobank governance: a lesson in trustNew Genetics and Society, 29
Jennifer Nedelsky (2011)
Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law
J. McHale (2011)
Accountability, Governance and Biobanks: The Ethics and Governance Committee as Guardian or as Toothless Tiger?Health Care Analysis, 19
(2014)
Human biomedical research bill: Public consultation Nov-Dec 2014
C. Lenk, N. Hoppe, K. Beier, C. Wiesemann (2011)
Human Tissue Research
S. Rosenbaum (2010)
Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access.Health services research, 45 5 Pt 2
P. Williams, K. Schepp, B. McGrath, P. Mitchell (2010)
The Stewardship Model: Current Viability for Genetic Biobank Practice DevelopmentAdvances in Nursing Science, 33
H. Gottweis, K. Zatloukal (2007)
Biobank Governance: Trends and PerspectivesPathobiology, 74
S. Goodman (1999)
Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value FallacyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 130
R. Briggs (2014)
Normative Theories of Rational Choice: Expected UtilityStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
G. Hripcsak, M. Bloomrosen, P. Brennan, C. Chute, J. Cimino, D. Detmer, M. Edmunds, P. Embí, M. Goldstein, W. Hammond, G. Keenan, S. Labkoff, Shawn Murphy, C. Safran, S. Speedie, H. Strasberg, Freda Temple, A. Wilcox (2014)
Health data use, stewardship, and governance: ongoing gaps and challenges: a report from AMIA's 2012 Health Policy MeetingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 21 2
(2015)
Ethics guidelines for human biomedical research
B. Jeffers (2001)
Human biological materials in research: ethical issues and the role of stewardship in minimizing research risks.ANS. Advances in nursing science, 24 2
O. O’neill (2004)
Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research.Clinical medicine, 4 3
K. Steinsbekk, Bjørn Myskja, B. Solberg (2013)
Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: Is passive participation an ethical problem?European Journal of Human Genetics, 21
J. Elliott, W. Ho, Sylvia Lim (2010)
Bioethics in Singapore: The Ethical Microcosm
M. Deschenes, C. Sallée (2005)
Accountability in Population Biobanking: Comparative ApproachesThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 33
J. Fisher (2010)
Observing BioethicsContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 39
Statistical release 1: demographic characteristics, education, language and religion
E. Kort, B. Campbell, J. Resau (2003)
A human tissue and data resource: an overview of opportunities, challenges, and development of a provider/researcher partnership modelComputer methods and programs in biomedicine, 70 2
Thomas Ploug, S. Holm (2016)
Meta Consent – A Flexible Solution to the Problem of Secondary Use of Health DataBioethics, 30
L. Donaldson, J. Davis (1991)
Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder ReturnsAustralian Journal of Management, 16
A 10-year (2002 to 2011) retrospective analysis of consent documentation for the donation of leftover or residual human tissue from surgical interventions at a major academic healthcare institution in Singapore was conducted. Findings suggest that demographics like gender, religious belief and socioeconomic status could be indicators of the willingness of a patient to donate residual tissue to a tissue repository or biobank for future research use. Patients in general did not decide to donate based on specific details that were provided to them. Instead, those who donated were of a background that engendered a level of security or confidence that harm would not befall them. It is argued that willingness to donate depended more on this sense or perception of security that arose from systemic trustworthiness than from the rigour of consent-taking. In 2015, changes to the regulation of tissue banking and related activities in Singapore include legislative requirement for a prescribed list of information to be provided to a prospective tissue donor in consent-taking. While this and other legislative changes are important to ensure that tissue donation for research remains informed and voluntary, it is argued that trust and trustworthiness remain an unfinished project. Tissue repositories or biobanks more broadly must be constituted as moral institutions that safeguard the interests and rights of altruistic tissue donors. More critically, they must advance security and trustworthiness through good stewardship that is directed at promoting the common good through accountability, transparency and control.
Asian Bioethics Review – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 13, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.