Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/arguments-stories-and-criminal-evidence-two-approaches-to-reasoning-KRseYDPhna
References (93)
-
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, P. McBurney (2006)
Computational Representation of Practical ArgumentSynthese, 152
-
J. Josephson, S. Josephson (1994)
Abductive inference : computation, philosophy, technology -
A. Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson (2008)
Three Senses of "Argument" -
C. Poot, R. Bokhorst, P. Koppen, E. Muller (2004)
Rechercheportret: Over dilemma's in de opsporing. -
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1993)
Reasoning in explanation-based decision makingCognition, 49
-
M. Toolan (1989)
Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction -
S. Modgil (2007)
An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences -
Charles Twardy (2004)
Argument Maps Improve Critical ThinkingTeaching Philosophy, 27
-
R. Schank, R. Abelson (1978)
Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures -
P. Casanovas, G. Sartor, N. Casellas, Rossella Rubino (2008)
Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies, 4884
-
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1992)
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62
-
D. Schum (2002)
Species of Abductive Reasoning in Fact Investigation in Law -
D. Walton, Burkhard Schafer (2007)
Arthur, George and the Mystery of the Missing Motive: Towards a Theory of Evidentiary Reasoning about MotivesInternational Commentary on Evidence, 4
-
Floris Bex, H. Prakken, C. Reed, D. Walton (2003)
Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and GeneralisationsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 11
-
H.F.M. Crombach, P. Koppen, Willem Wagenaar (2006)
Dubieuze zaken: De psychologie van strafrechtelijk bewijs -
H. Crombag, W. Wagenaar, P. Koppen (1994)
Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence -
David Hume (1970)
A Treatise of Human Nature -
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
-
J. Pollock (1995)
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person -
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst (2003)
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: References -
Yanna Rider, N. Thomason (2008)
Cognitive and Pedagogical Benefits of Argument Mapping: L.A.M.P. Guides the Way to Better Thinking -
L. Schehr, C. Boheemen, M. Bal (1988)
Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of NarrativeSubstance, 17
-
S. Braak, H. Oostendorp, H. Prakken, G. Vreeswijk (2008)
Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis -
M. Malsch, J. Nijboer (1999)
Complex cases : perspective on the Netherlands criminal justice system -
H. Prakken (2005)
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning -
J. Freeman (1991)
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure -
D. Walton (1998)
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument -
Bart Verheij (2003)
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal LogicArtificial Intelligence and Law, 11
-
N. Johnson, J. Mandler (1980)
A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in storiesPoetics, 9
-
Z. join, J. Wigmore (1931)
The Principles of Judicial Proof: Or the Process of Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials, 80
-
Dan Simon (2004)
A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision MakingUniversity of Chicago Law Review, 71
-
J. Kadane, D. Schum (1996)
A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence -
J. Nijboer (1993)
Common Law tradition in evidence scholarship observed from a continental perspectiveAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 41
-
S. Toulmin (1960)
The uses of argument -
Paul Thagard (2004)
CAUSAL INFERENCE IN LEGAL DECISION MAKING: EXPLANATORY COHERENCE VS. BAYESIAN NETWORKSApplied Artificial Intelligence, 18
-
G. Vreeswijk (1993)
Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach Towards Defeasible ArgumentationJ. Log. Comput., 3
-
R. Schank (1995)
The structure of episodes in memory -
Paul Thagard, C. Shelley (1997)
Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence -
H. Crombag, J. Israels (2008)
Moord in Anjum. Te veel niet gestelde vragen -
坂内 宏行 (2003)
書評 Michael Toolan: Narrative: A critical Linguistic Introduction Second Edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2001), 48
-
J. Pearl (1998)
Bayesian Networks -
R. Loui (1987)
Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inferenceComputational Intelligence, 3
-
P. Koppen, H. Merckelbach, M. Jelicic, J. Keijser (2010)
Reizen met mijn rechter: Psychologie van het recht -
D. Bobrow, A. Collins (1975)
Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science -
Floris Bex, H. Prakken, T. Gordon (2004)
Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue : an application to evidential reasoning -
T. Trabasso, P. Broek (1985)
Causal thinking and the representation of narrative eventsJournal of Memory and Language, 24
-
D. Walton, E. Krabbe (1995)
Commitment In Dialogue -
W. Twining (1990)
Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays -
R. Heuer (1999)
Psychology of Intelligence Analysis -
D. Walton (1995)
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning -
M. MacCrimmon, P. Tillers (2002)
The Dynamics of Judicial Proof: Computation, Logic, and Common Sense -
H. Prakken, G. Vreeswijk (2001)
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation -
S. Braak, H. Oostendorp, H. Prakken, G. Vreeswijk (2006)
A critical review of argument visualization tools: Do users become better reasoners? -
M. Malsch, Ian Freckelton (2008)
The evaluation of evidence : Differences between legal systems -
J. Josephson (2002)
On the Proof Dynamics of Inference to the Best Explanation -
T. Trabasso, L. Sperry (1985)
Causal relatedness and importance of story eventsJournal of Memory and Language, 24
-
H. Kaptein, H. Prakken, Bart Verheij (2009)
Legal Evidence and Proof -
H. Einhorn, R. Hogarth (1986)
Judging probable cause.Psychological Bulletin, 99
-
M. Shanahan (1989)
Prediction is Deduction but Explanation is Abduction -
R. Schank (1986)
Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively -
H. Prakken (1997)
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument -
R. Loui (1998)
Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative ReasoningComputational Intelligence, 14
-
Leila Amgoud, C. Cayrol (2002)
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable ArgumentsAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 34
-
D. Schum (1994)
The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning -
R. Sugden (2008)
David Hume’s Treatise of Human NatureTopoi, 27
-
C. Chesñevar, Ana Maguitman, R. Loui (2000)
Logical models of argumentACM Comput. Surv., 32
-
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1988)
Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgmentJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14
-
C. Reed, Glenn Rowe (2004)
Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and RepresentationInt. J. Artif. Intell. Tools, 13
-
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1997)
Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible PrioritiesJ. Appl. Non Class. Logics, 7
-
Henry Prakken (2006)
Formal systems for persuasion dialogueThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 21
-
(2008)
Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation -
J. Pearl (1988)
Embracing Causality in Default ReasoningArtif. Intell., 35
-
P. Lucas (1997)
Symbolic diagnosis and its formalisationThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 12
-
L. Console, P. Torasso (1991)
A spectrum of logical definitions of model‐based diagnosis 1Computational Intelligence, 7
-
Floris Bex, Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson (2009)
Did he jump or was he pushed?Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17
-
T. Gordon, H. Prakken, D. Walton (2007)
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proofArtif. Intell., 171
-
J. Mandler, N. Johnson (1977)
Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recallCognitive Psychology, 9
-
J. Kerstholt, A. Eikelboom (2007)
Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysisJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20
-
Floris Bex, S. Braak, H. Oostendorp, H. Prakken, Bart Verheij, G. Vreeswijk (2007)
Sense-Making Software for Crime Investigation: How to Combine Stories and Arguments?Law, Probability and Risk, 6
-
A. Okada, S. Shum, T. Sherborne (2008)
Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques -
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1993)
The story model for juror decision making -
D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (2002)
Handbook of Philosophical Logic -
A. Dingley (1999)
The Ballpoint Case: A wigmorean analysis -
M. Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, J. Benthem (1997)
Logic and Scientific Methods -
D. Rumelhart (1975)
NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES -
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1986)
Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
-
R. Hastie (1993)
Inside the juror: Models of juror decision making -
N. Rescher (1977)
Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge -
Paul Thagard (2005)
Testimony, Credibility, and Explanatory CoherenceErkenntnis, 63
-
R. Loui, Jeff Norman (1995)
Rationales and argument movesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 3
-
T. Anderson, D. Schum, W. Twining (2005)
Analysis of Evidence: Frontmatter -
Elizabeth Loftus, Edith Greene, W. Bennett, Martha Feldman (1981)
Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture -
Samuel Stoljar, L. Cohen (1980)
The Probable and the Provable.The Philosophical Quarterly, 29
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright
- © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
- ISBN
- 978-94-007-0139-7
- Pages
- 33 –82
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-0140-3_3
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[The two types of reasoning that represent the main trends in the research on reasoning with criminal evidence. The first is argumentative reasoning, where the parties argue for and against the facts-at-issue using arguments based on evidence. The second type of reasoning is story-based or narrative reasoning, where the parties each provide alternative stories that explain the evidence. The advantages and disadvantages of each of the types of reasoning and the similarities and differences between them are also discussed.]
Published: Nov 10, 2010
Keywords: Causal Relation; Argumentation Scheme; Expert Testimony; Evidential Data; Abductive Reasoning