Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Michael Yahuda (2013)
China's New Assertiveness in the South China SeaJournal of Contemporary China, 22
C. Mohan (2012)
Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific
M. Wesley (2010)
Australia Faces a Changing AsiaCurrent History, 109
J. Hemmings (2011)
THE POTENTIAL FOR SINO-US DISCORD IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEAThe RUSI Journal, 156
S. Ali (2017)
US-China Strategic Triangles: Theory and Reality of Indo-Pacific Insecurity
Chengxin Pan (2016)
China anxieties in the geopolitical cartographies of the Indo-Pacific
Linda Quayle (2013)
Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations
Dana Dillon (2011)
Countering Beijing in the South China SeaPolicy Review
Rajaram Panda (2012)
India and Australia: Security Dynamics in the Asia PacificAsia-Pacific Review, 19
Biao Zhang (2019)
Graham Allison, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24
Zack Cooper, A. Shearer (2017)
Thinking clearly about China’s layered Indo-Pacific strategyBulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73
M. Green (2009)
Asia in the Debate on American Grand StrategyNaval War College Review, 62
R. Hu (2016)
The Chinese Response to the US Rebalancing Strategy: Sino–US Relations and Washington’s Pivot to Asia
E. Fels (2016)
Shifting Power in Asia-Pacific?: The Rise of China, Sino-US Competition and Regional Middle Power Allegiance
Gaye Christoffersen (2016)
Pathways to a Northeast Asian Energy Regime
Frédéric Grare (2017)
India Turns East: International Engagement and US-China Rivalry
Cheng-Yi Lin (2016)
Chinese Response to Obama’s Rebalancing to Asia Strategy
Edmond Roy (2011)
Australian Uranium and India: Ideology versus PragmatismSouth Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 34
Linda Quayle (2013)
Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations: A Region-Theory Dialogue
Dake Chen (2011)
Indo-Pacific Tripole: AN Intrinsic Mode of Tropical Climate Variability
Hugh White (2010)
Power Shift: Australia's Future between Washington and BeijingQuarterly Essay
Cheng-Chwee Kuik, N. Idris, A. Nor (2012)
The China Factor in the U.S. “Reengagement” With Southeast Asia: Drivers and Limits of Converged HedgingAsian Politics & Policy, 4
Stephen Blank, Younkyoo Kim (2012)
Restarting the Six-Party Talks: Russia's Dilemmas and Current PerspectivesKorea Observer, 43
Nalanda Roy (2016)
The South China Sea Disputes: Past, Present, and Future
Hugh Santis (2012)
The China Threat and the “Pivot” to AsiaCurrent History, 111
Редакционная Статья (2018)
Mahbubani, Kishore; Sng, Jeffery. The ASEAN Miracle. A Catalyst for Peace. Singapore: Ridge books, 2017, 9
W. Ladwig (2009)
Delhi's Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, “Look East,” and India's Emerging Influence in the Asia-PacificAsian Security, 5
Harsh Pant (2016)
Indian foreign policy: An overview
P. Chacko (2016)
New regional geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific : drivers, dynamics and consequences
David Shambaugh (2013)
China Goes Global: The Partial Power
V. Shekhar (2018)
Indonesia’s Foreign Policy and Grand Strategy in the 21st Century: Rise of an Indo-Pacific Power
J. Bradford (2011)
The Maritime Strategy of the United States: Implications for Indo-Pacific Sea LanesContemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 33
[While the paradigm-shift from continental Asia-pacific to new maritime geopolitical framework of ‘Indo-pacific’ may be a dynamic discursive to ensure strategic equilibrium amongst multiple new and old stakeholders, continued exclusion of China remains its most formidable limitation. However, apart from this exclusion in Western discourse, there remain internal triggers to China’s reluctance that reinforce such external responses treating China as trigger but not integral to their construction of the new Indo-Pacific paradigm. Also, driven by bean-counting of the realists, the contemporary discourses seem far too influenced by prophecies of inevitable Sino-US confrontation. These often miss nuanced responses in Chinese discourses that may not flow from its military might but imperceptible cultural and economic entwines. The central contention of this paper is that it remains a prerequisite for the peaceful development of both China and the Indo-Pacific framework that they mutually synergise their engagement towards maximising mutual benefits. Staying apart has only been counterproductive. This is where India—that has substantial security and economic engagements respectively with both US and China—can perhaps smoothen this interface in order to make Indo-Pacific an inclusive, effective as also a sustainable geopolitical proposition.]
Published: Jun 12, 2019
Keywords: Indo-Pacific; India; China; Geopolitics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.