Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/an-event-related-potential-study-on-the-observation-of-erroneous-4PFU37rBER
References (36)
-
Clay Holroyd, M. Coles (2002)
The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.Psychological review, 109 4
-
N. Yeung, R. Bogacz, Clay Holroyd, S. Nieuwenhuis, J. Cohen (2007)
Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity.Psychophysiology, 44 1
-
F. Donkers, S. Nieuwenhuis, G. Boxtel (2005)
Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 25 3
-
O. Krigolson, Clay Holroyd (2006)
Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brainNeuroscience, 137
-
P. Luu, D. Tucker, S. Makeig (2004)
Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulationClinical Neurophysiology, 115
-
S. Debener, M. Ullsperger, M. Siegel, K. Fiehler, D. Cramon, A. Engel (2005)
Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance MonitoringThe Journal of Neuroscience, 25
-
W. Gehring, Adrian Willoughby (2003)
Are all medial frontal negativities created equal ? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring -
J. Yordanova, M. Falkenstein, J. Hohnsbein, V. Kolev (2004)
Parallel systems of error processing in the brainNeuroImage, 22
-
G. Gratton, M. Coles, E. Donchin (1983)
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 55 4
-
H. Schie, R. Mars, M. Coles, H. Bekkering (2004)
Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observationNature Neuroscience, 7
-
K. Fiehler, M. Ullsperger, D. Yves, V. Cramon (2005)
Electrophysiological correlates of error correction.Psychophysiology, 42 1
-
W. Gehring, B. Goss, M. Coles, D. Meyer, E. Donchin (1993)
A Neural System for Error Detection and CompensationPsychological Science, 4
-
F. C. L. Donkers, S. Nieuwenhuis, G. J. M. Boxtel (2005)
Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of respondingCognitive Brain Research, 25
-
E. Bruijn, W. Hulstijn, R. Verkes, G. Ruigt, B. Sabbe (2004)
Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteersPsychopharmacology, 177
-
P. Ullsperger, A. Mecklinger (1996)
P300 as index of cognitve adaptation -
E. Bruijn, W. Hulstijn, R. Meulenbroek, G. Galen (2003)
Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task.Psychophysiology, 40 5
-
E. Donchin, M. Coles (1988)
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11
-
(1996)
P300 as index of cognitive -
W. Miltner, J. Brauer, H. Hecht, R. Trippe, M. Coles (2004)
Parallel brain activity for self-generated and observed errors -
(1990)
Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention -
M. Falkenstein, J. Hohnsbein, J. Hoormann, L. Blanke (1990)
Psychophysiological brain research -
Richard Ridderinkhof, M. Ullsperger, E. Crone, S. Nieuwenhuis (2004)
The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive ControlScience, 306
-
S. Manthey, R. Schubotz, D. Cramon (2003)
Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: an fMRI study.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 15 3
-
P. Luu, Tobias Flaisch, D. Tucker (2000)
Medial Frontal Cortex in Action MonitoringThe Journal of Neuroscience, 20
-
M. Ullsperger, Kirsten Volz, D. Cramon (2004)
A common neural system signaling the need for behavioral changesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 8
-
A. Mecklinger, P. Ullsperger (1995)
The P300 to novel and target events: a spatio–temporal dipole model analysisNeuroReport, 7
-
Geoffrey Iverson, E. Wagenmakers, Michael Lee (2010)
A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.Psychological methods, 15 2
-
P. Luu, D. Tucker (2001)
Regulating action: alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networksClinical Neurophysiology, 112
-
B. Eriksen, C. Eriksen (1974)
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch taskPerception & Psychophysics, 16
-
P. Ullsperger, A. Mecklinger (1996)
Recent advances in event-related brain potential research -
A. Bates, Tina Patel, P. Liddle (2005)
External Behavior Monitoring Mirrors Internal Behavior MonitoringJournal of Psychophysiology, 19
-
W. H. R. Miltner, J. Brauer, H. Hecht, R. Trippe, M. G. H. Coles (2004)
Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring -
S. Manthey, R. I Schubotz, D. Y. Cramon (2003)
Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: An fMRI studyCognitive Brain Research, 15
-
M. Desmurget, H. Gréa, J. Grethe, C. Prablanc, G. Alexander, Scott Grafton (2001)
Functional Anatomy of Nonvisual Feedback Loops during Reaching: A Positron Emission Tomography StudyThe Journal of Neuroscience, 21
-
M. Falkenstein, J. Hoormann, Stefan Christ, J. Hohnsbein (2000)
ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorialBiological Psychology, 51
-
M. Desmurget, C. Epstein, R. Turner, C. Prablanc, G. Alexander, Scott Grafton (1999)
Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual targetNature Neuroscience, 2
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 by Psychonomic Society, Inc.
- Subject
- Psychology; Cognitive Psychology; Neurosciences
- ISSN
- 1530-7026
- eISSN
- 1531-135X
- DOI
- 10.3758/CABN.7.4.278
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Recent experiments have demonstrated that error-related negativity (ERN) is not only elicited when people commit errors, but also when they observe others committing errors. The present study investigates whether this observed ERN is also present when participants observe execution errors in an everyday context. Participants observed short sequences of pictures showing steps of everyday actions ending either erroneously or correctly. Participants were instructed to indicate by a delayed response whether the observed action was correctly executed or not. The results showed a large P300 for execution errors compared with the observation of correct sequences, but no ERN activity was found. The present experiment indicates that the detection of execution errors in observation does not rely on the error processing mechanism responsible for generating the ERN. The increased P300 amplitudes suggest a more general monitoring process that signals that the occurrence of unexpected events is involved in the detection of execution errors.
Journal
Cognitive, Affective, & Behaviorial Neuroscience – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 7, 2010