Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[After reviewing relevant background and preliminaries in Chaps. 1 and 2, our discussion sets off from an overview of the state-of-the-art of adversary detection techniques against the PUE attack and the Byzantine attack in Chap. 3. In the subsequent chapters, more detailed case studies of several adversary detection schemes are conducted. Specifically, a link signature assisted PUE attack detection scheme is discussed in Chap. 4. In Chap. 5, an HMM-based Byzantine detection scheme is introduced. In this approach, the adversary is detected by inspecting the parameter difference in the corresponding HMM models for the honest SUs and the adversary. In Chap. 6, a CFC based Byzantine attack detection algorithm was presented. In this approach, two CFC statistics are extracted from the SUs spectrum sensing behaviors and then compared with those of a trusted SU for adversary detection. Lastly, concluding remarks and outlooks for future works are provided in this chapter.]
Published: Mar 8, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.