Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Notions related to explanation have also emerged in theories of belief change in AI. One does not just want to incorporate new beliefs, but often also, to justify them. The main motivation of these theories is to develop logical and computational mechanisms to incorporate newinformation to a scientific theory, data base or set of beliefs. Different types of change are appropriate in different situations. Indeed, the pioneeringwork of Carlos Alchourrón, PeterGärdenfors and David Makinson (often referred as theAGMapproach) [AGM85], proposes a normative theory of epistemic change characterized by the conditions that a rational belief change operator should satisfy.]
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: Logical Consequence; Belief Revision; Belief State; Basic Belief; Epistemic Attitude
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.