Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Tarrow (2001)
TRANSNATIONAL POLITICS: Contention and Institutions in International PoliticsAnnual Review of Political Science, 4
Daniel Chernilo (2011)
The critique of methodological nationalismThesis Eleven, 106
Husrev Tabak (2015)
Broadening the Nongovernmental Humanitarian Mission: The IHH and MediationInsight Turkey, 17
S. Robertson, I. Dale (2008)
Researching education in a globalising era: beyond methodological nationalism, methodological statism, methodological educationism and spatial fetishism
U. Beck (2007)
Beyond class and nation: reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world.The British journal of sociology, 58 4
Edgar Grande (2006)
Cosmopolitan political science.The British journal of sociology, 57 1
U. Beck (2007)
The Cosmopolitan ConditionTheory, Culture & Society, 24
David Lake (2007)
The State and International Relations
Daniel Chernilo (2006)
Social Theory’s Methodological NationalismEuropean Journal of Social Theory, 9
U. Beck, N. Sznaider (2006)
Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences : a research agendaBritish Journal of Sociology, 57
Thomas Risse-Kappen, Steve Ropp, Kathryn Sikkink (1999)
The power of human rights : international norms and domestic changeForeign Affairs, 78
P. Sztompka (2010)
One Sociology or Many
U. Beck (2003)
Toward a New Critical Theory with a Cosmopolitan IntentConstellations, 10
U. Beck (2000)
The cosmopolitan perspective: sociology of the second age of modernity*British Journal of Sociology, 51
R. Gilpin (1971)
The Politics of Transnational Economic RelationsInternational Organization, 25
U. Beck (2005)
War Is Peace: On Post-National WarSecurity Dialogue, 36
U. Beck, Ciaran Cronin (2006)
The Cosmopolitan Vision
U. Beck (2017)
Mobility and the Cosmopolitan Perspective
R. Price (2003)
Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World PoliticsWorld Politics, 55
Thomas Risse-Kappen (1995)
Bringing transnational relations back in: Structures of governance and transnational relations: what have we learned?
Thomas Risse-Kappen (1995)
Bringing transnational relations back in: Bringing transnational relations back in: introduction
U. Beck (2002)
The Cosmopolitan Society and Its EnemiesTheory, Culture & Society, 19
G. Hellmann (2014)
Methodological Transnationalism – Europe’s Offering to Global IR?ERIS – European Review of International Studies, 1
A. Wimmer, N. Schiller (2002)
Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciencesSociology of Power
Hüsrev Tabak (2016)
Metodolojik Ulusçuluk ve Türkiye’de Dış Politika Çalışmaları, 13
T. Risse (2007)
Transnational Actors and World Politics
W. Robinson (1998)
Beyond Nation-State Paradigms: Globalization, Sociology, and the Challenge of Transnational StudiesSociological Forum, 13
J. Nye, R. Keohane (1971)
Transnational Relations and World Politics: A ConclusionInternational Organization, 25
U. Beck (2009)
Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan VisionConstellations, 16
J. Nye, R. Keohane (1971)
Transnational Relations and World Politics: An IntroductionInternational Organization, 25
U. Beck, Edgar Grande (2010)
Varieties of second modernity: the cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research.The British journal of sociology, 61 3
Hüsrev Tabak (2019)
Uluslararası’nın Beckçi EleştirisiAnkara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi
M. Barnett, Kathryn Sikkink (2008)
From International Relations to Global Society
R. Gilpin (1976)
The Political Economy of the Multinational Corporation: Three Contrasting PerspectivesAmerican Political Science Review, 70
U. Beck (2004)
Rooted Cosmopolitanism: Emerging from a Rivalry of Distinctions
P. Haas (1992)
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordinationInternational Organization, 46
[This chapter raises a critique of methodological nationalism’s dominancy in the way transnationality is studied within mainstream International Relations and adopts Beckian methodological cosmopolitanism for going beyond such a scholarly bias. Methodological cosmopolitanism, the study suggests, would enable IR and foreign policy scholarship (1) to elaborate and report the world they are studying (or the knowledge about the realities of it) without contributing to its reification as a material setting, and (2) to better understand the transnational and cosmopolitan shifts the contemporary world has gone through, by which the core units, levels and structures of research the scholarship adopt would be transnationally redefined. Here, the chapter introduces a domestic global politics framework as part of a quest for transnational cosmopolitan foreign policy research and applies it to explaining the transnational character and complexity of the Syrian civil war and the responses to it from within territorial Turkey.]
Published: May 26, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.