Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Space of Their Own: The Archaeology of Nineteenth Century Lunatic Asylums in Britain, South Australia and TasmaniaTasmania and the ‘Ideal’ Asylum

A Space of Their Own: The Archaeology of Nineteenth Century Lunatic Asylums in Britain, South... [If South Australia, a free colony, was to struggle to realize the provisions required by the ‘ideal’ asylum models of John Conolly and later asylum reformers, what then was to be the fate of the insane in Tasmania where a portion of the colonists were convicts serving out their sentences in Australia and not the prisons of England? This question leads to other important questions such as did the social and class based judgments about the perceived inmates of the lunatic asylum affect the type of buildings provided and the treatment regime undertaken? Was the treatment of the convicts more punitive? South Australia had provided purpose-built asylums for its colonists; did Tasmania provide similar institutions for its convict population? Were there separate institutions for convicts and free colonists?] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Space of Their Own: The Archaeology of Nineteenth Century Lunatic Asylums in Britain, South Australia and TasmaniaTasmania and the ‘Ideal’ Asylum

Download PDF
33 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-space-of-their-own-the-archaeology-of-nineteenth-century-lunatic-q0vpSsuvup

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer New York
Copyright
© Springer-Verlag New York 2007
ISBN
978-0-387-73385-2
Pages
149 –182
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-73386-9_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[If South Australia, a free colony, was to struggle to realize the provisions required by the ‘ideal’ asylum models of John Conolly and later asylum reformers, what then was to be the fate of the insane in Tasmania where a portion of the colonists were convicts serving out their sentences in Australia and not the prisons of England? This question leads to other important questions such as did the social and class based judgments about the perceived inmates of the lunatic asylum affect the type of buildings provided and the treatment regime undertaken? Was the treatment of the convicts more punitive? South Australia had provided purpose-built asylums for its colonists; did Tasmania provide similar institutions for its convict population? Were there separate institutions for convicts and free colonists?]

Published: Jan 1, 2007

Keywords: Royal Commission; Dine Room; Moral Treatment; Lunatic Asylum; Work Room

There are no references for this article.