Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In the previous chapters we have seen that the early introduction of the receptor concept by Langley and Ehrlich was a very hypothetical approach and was considered only as one of a number of options available to clarify the problem of drug binding. Consequently, its fate remained uncertain within the scientific community of pharmacologists during the first half of the twentieth century. The most important representatives of the discipline propagated competing alternative theories as well as alternative research strands. In spite of this, the receptor concept survived, particularly through the development of quantitative theories of drug action, which achieved a clear breakthrough in the 1930s with Alfred Joseph Clark’s work on drug binding to cells. After Clark’s early death, scientists such as Gaddum, Ariëns and Stephenson deepened the research on the mechanism of drug binding to receptors (see Chapter 5).]
Published: Sep 25, 2015
Keywords: Adrenergic Receptor; Nobel Prize; Short History; Drug Binding; Nictitate Membrane
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.