Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[As we saw in the last chapter, proponents of the chemical theory were confronted with the physical theory as a competing explanation of the specific mode of action of drugs. But they were also confronted with a competitive new research strand, namely the work on transmitter substances. Links existed between the receptor idea and the concept of transmitters within the notion of a ‘receptive mechanism’ (to use Sollmann and Hanzlik’s term). However, this did not mean that they had the same history. On the contrary, the two research strands developed quite independently and the massive interest of pharmacologists in transmitters actually hampered the unfolding of research into receptors. In other words, the focus on transmitters decreased the probability that the hypothetical ideas about receptors and concepts of receptors would become a major issue in pharmacology. This is especially true for the first three decades of the twentieth century. In this chapter we take a closer look at this process.]
Published: Sep 25, 2015
Keywords: Autonomic Nervous System; Myoneural Junction; Physical Theory; Chemical Theory; Nobel Lecture
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.