A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s TraditionConclusion
A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s Tradition: Conclusion
Gubelmann, Reto
2019-07-28 00:00:00
[This chapter summarizes the insights of the previous chapters. It concludes that naturalists face a dilemma when trying to say what scientific justification amounts to, which in turn suggests that this is a non-empirical question. Furthermore, it assesses the prospects of naturalized epistemology based on this suggestion, and by drawing on the results of part one of the book.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-science-based-critique-of-epistemological-naturalism-in-quine-s-LanimzhCvA
A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s TraditionConclusion
[This chapter summarizes the insights of the previous chapters. It concludes that naturalists face a dilemma when trying to say what scientific justification amounts to, which in turn suggests that this is a non-empirical question. Furthermore, it assesses the prospects of naturalized epistemology based on this suggestion, and by drawing on the results of part one of the book.]
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.