Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Windsor, S. Cleary, Kalpana Ramiah, Jeannie Clark, L. Abroms, Amanda Davis (2013)
The Smoking Cessation and Reduction in Pregnancy Treatment (SCRIPT) Adoption Scale: Evaluating the Diffusion of a Tobacco Treatment Innovation to a Statewide Prenatal Care Program and ProvidersJournal of Health Communication, 18
(2005)
A pregnant woman’s guide to quit smoking, 5th edn
R. Windsor, J. Lowe, L. Perkins, D. Smith-Yoder, L. Artz, M. Crawford, K. Amburgy, N. Boyd (1993)
Health education for pregnant smokers: its behavioral impact and cost benefit.American journal of public health, 83 2
N. Benowitz, P. Jacob, K. Ahijevych, M. Jarvis, S. Hall, J. LeHouezec, Anna Hansson, E. Lichtenstein, J. Henningfield, J. Tsoh, R. Hurt, W. Velicer (2002)
Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 4 2
Tobacco Panel (2008)
Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update
R. Windsor, G. Cutter, J. Morris, Y. Reese, B. Manzella, E. Bartlett, C. Samuelson, D. Spanos (1985)
The effectiveness of smoking cessation methods for smokers in public health maternity clinics: a randomized trial.American journal of public health, 75 12
T. Cook, D. Campbell (1979)
Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings
R. Windsor, Jeannie Clark, S. Cleary, Amanda Davis, Stephanie Thorn, L. Abroms, John Wedeles (2013)
Effectiveness of the Smoking Cessation and Reduction in Pregnancy Treatment (SCRIPT) Dissemination Project: A Science to Prenatal Care Practice PartnershipMaternal and Child Health Journal, 18
J. Lumley, SS Oliver, E. Waters, L. Oakley (2000)
Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2
J. Ware, M. Hamel (2011)
Pragmatic trials--guides to better patient care?The New England journal of medicine, 364 18
R. Windsor, N. Boyd, C. Orleans (1998)
A meta-evaluation of smoking cessation intervention research among pregnant women: improving the science and art.Health education research, 13 3
Margaret Cooke, R. Mattick, Raoul Walsh (2001)
Differential uptake of a smoking cessation programme disseminated to doctors and midwives in antenatal clinics.Addiction, 96 3
T Cook, D Campbell (1979)
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings
R. Windsor, C. Li, N. Boyd, K. Hartmann (1999)
The Use of Significant Reduction Rates to Evaluate Health Education Methods for Pregnant Smokers: A New Harm Reduction Behavioral Indicator?Health Education & Behavior, 26
(2005)
Commit to quit smoking during and after pregnancy, 2nd ed
(2006)
Medicaid mothers who smoke during pregnancy, WV residents
(2010)
Committee opinion no. 471: Smoking cessation during pregnancy.Obstetrics and gynecology, 116 5
R. Windsor (2015)
Evaluation of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs: Improving Population Health through Evidence-Based Practice
(2007)
Reports on the Blueprint to Improve West Virginia perinatal health: Final report. Charleston, WV: Community Voices, Inc. The Affordable Care Act
R. Windsor, H. Whiteside, L. Solomon, S. Prows, R. Donatelle, P. Cinciripini, H. McIlvain (2000)
A process evaluation model for patient education programs for pregnant smokersTobacco Control, 9
J. Lowe, K. Balanda, W. Stanton, C. Mar, V. O’Connor (2002)
Dissemination of an Efficacious Antenatal Smoking Cessation Program in Public Hospitals in Australia: A Randomized Controlled TrialHealth Education & Behavior, 29
R. Goldenberg, L. Klerman, R. Windsor, H. Whiteside (2000)
Smoking in pregnancy: final thoughtsTobacco Control, 9
Lesa Woodby, R. Windsor, Scott Snyder, C. Kohler, C. DiClemente (1999)
Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy.Addiction, 94 2
R. Windsor (2011)
Behavioral Treatment Methods for Pregnant Smokers: The Evidence Base for Prenatal Care Programs and Professional Practice
(2003)
Diffusion of Innovation, 5th Ed
V Tong, J Jones, P Dietz, D D’Angelo, J Bombard (2009)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy–pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), united states, 31 sites, 2000–2005MMWR Surveillance Summary, 58
(2007)
Reports on the Blueprint to Improve West Virginia perinatal health: Final report
E. Waters, J. Lumley, S. Oliver (1998)
Smoking cessation programs implemented during pregnancy
(2008)
SCRIPT counseling guidelines
C. Gomez, I. Berlin, P. Marquis, M. Delcroix (2005)
Expired air carbon monoxide concentration in mothers and their spouses above 5 ppm is associated with decreased fetal growth.Preventive medicine, 40 1
Singapore Psychological (2008)
Treating Tobacco Use and DependencePediatrics, 122
NL Benowitz (2002)
Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessationNicotine Tobacco Research, 4
M. Fiore, W. Bailey, S. Cohen, S. Dorfman, M. Goldstein, E. Gritz, R. Heyman, C. Jaén, T. Kottke, H. Lando, R. Mecklenburg, P. Mullen, L. Nett, L. Robinson, M. Stitzer, A. Tommasello, L. Villejo, M. Wewers (2000)
Treating tobacco use and dependence: clinical practice guideline
(2009)
Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 31 sites, 2000-2005.
M. Kharrazi, G. Delorenze, F. Kaufman, B. Eskenazi, J. Bernert, S. Graham, M. Pearl, J. Pirkle (2004)
Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Pregnancy OutcomeEpidemiology, 15
Alastair Baker (2001)
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st CenturyBMJ : British Medical Journal, 323
C. Li, R. Windsor, J. Lowe, R. Goldenberg (1992)
Evaluation of the impact of dissemination of smoking cessation methods on the low birthweight rate and on health care costs: achieving year 2000 objectives for the nation.American journal of preventive medicine, 8 3
Patricia Dolan-Mullen, G. Ramirez, J. Groff (1994)
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of prenatal smoking cessation interventions.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 171 5
R Windsor (2011)
Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in reproductive and perinatal outcomes: The evidence from population-based interventions
A. Handler, J. Kennelly, N. Peacock (2011)
Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes
(2014)
DrPH Dissertation, Predictors of program participation and behavior change among pregnant women in the West Virginia-Smoking Cessation and Reduction
(2014)
US Department of Health and Human Services website
Richard Windsor, Lesa Woodby, Thomas Miller, J. Hardin, Myra Crawford, Carlo DiClemente (2000)
Effectiveness of Agency for Health Care Policy and Research clinical practice guideline and patient education methods for pregnant smokers in medicaid maternity care.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 182 1 Pt 1
Objectives Process evaluation data are essential to document the fidelity of program implementation by clinical staff and confirm patient behavior change. This report presents a process evaluation model applied to the Smoking Cessation and Reduction in Pregnancy Treatment Dissemination Initiative for the statewide, home-based West Virginia Right From The Start Project. Methods Trained RFTS Designated Care Coordinators, nurses and social workers, of 50+ primary care agencies in all 55 counties, delivered SCRIPT to Medicaid patients who smoked. Results The process evaluation defined the level of DCC delivery of seven core SCRIPT procedures to produce a Program Implementation Index: a summary performance metric. A SCRIPT PII > 0.80 was established as the RFTS adoption standard. The PII increased from 0.53 in 2004 to 0.65 in 2006–2007 to 0.77 in 2009–2010. Although the PII > 0.80 was not achieved, exposure rates were increased for all seven SCRIPT procedures. Agency and DCC turnover, a transient patient population, and recession of 2008–2010 were barriers to achieving the adoption metric and implementation of an experimental design. A quasi-experimental Stratified, Matched Comparison (C) Group Design was selected to evaluate behavioral impact differences between a RFTS-Comparison (C) Group from 2006 to 2007 and the RFTS-SCRIPT E Group from 2009 to 2010. Impact analyses of the DCC delivery of the SCRIPT Program with higher fidelity documented a statistically significant increase in the cessation rate from 4.6 % and significant reduction rate from 6.9 % for the (C) Group in 2006–2007 to 13.9 % and 11.22 % respectively for the E Group in 2009–2010. Conclusion The PEM can assist statewide, home-based prenatal care programs to improve the quality of delivery and evaluate counseling programs.
Maternal and Child Health Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 17, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.