Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/a-primer-on-nonmarket-valuation-experimental-methods-in-valuation-CbkIPezTth
References (60)
-
James Murphy, P. Allen, T. Stevens, Darryl Weatherhead (2003)
A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 30
-
Joseph Cook, D. Whittington, D. Canh, F. Johnson, A. Nyamete (2006)
RELIABILITY OF STATED PREFERENCES FOR CHOLERA AND TYPHOID VACCINES WITH TIME TO THINK IN HUE, VIETNAMEconomic Inquiry, 45
-
D. Ariely, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2006)
The Construction of Preference: “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences -
Christian Vossler, M. Doyon, D. Rondeau, Frédéric Roy-Vigneault (2010)
Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice ExperimentsPublic Choice: Public Goods eJournal
-
V. Hoffmann (2008)
Psychology, Gender, and the Intrahousehold Allocation of Free and Purchased Mosquito Nets -
J. List, C. Gallet (2001)
What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?Environmental and Resource Economics, 20
-
Daniel Lew, K. Wallmo (2011)
External Tests of Scope and Embedding in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 48
-
H. Bloom (1995)
Minimum Detectable EffectsEvaluation Review, 19
-
A. Gibbard (1973)
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General ResultEconometrica, 41
-
J. Herriges, C. Kling, Chih-Chen Liu, J. Tobias (2009)
What are the consequences of consequentiality -
R. Berrens, A. Bohara, Joe Kerkvliet, J. List (2004)
Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated PreferencesArtefactual Field Experiments
-
J. Loomis (2011)
What's to Know About Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation Studies?ERN: Other Econometrics: Data Collection & Data Estimation Methodology (Topic)
-
V. Smith (1964)
Effect of Market Organization on Competitive EquilibriumQuarterly Journal of Economics, 78
-
J. Kagel, A. Roth (1997)
Handbook of Experimental Economics -
T. Holmes, K. Boyle (2005)
Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation QuestionsLand Economics, 81
-
Christian Vossler, S. Watson (2012)
Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the fieldResearch Papers in Economics
-
C. Plott (1993)
Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis -
I. Bateman, I. Langford, A. Jones, G. Kerr (2001)
Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuationResource and Energy Economics, 23
-
M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, B. Kanninen (1991)
Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73
-
D. McFadden (2009)
The human side of mechanism design: a tribute to Leo Hurwicz and Jean-Jacque LaffontReview of Economic Design, 13
-
I. Langford, I. Bateman, Hugh Langford (1996)
A multilevel modelling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 7
-
J. Kagel (1995)
7. Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research -
K. Boyle, R. Bishop, Michael Welsh (1984)
Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding GamesLand Economics, 62
-
Daniel Hallstrom, V. Smith (2005)
Market responses to hurricanesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50
-
R. Carson, Theodore Groves (2007)
Incentive and informational properties of preference questionsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 37
-
A. Kapteyn, T. Wansbeek, Jeannine Buyze (1978)
The dynamics of preference formationEconomics Letters, 1
-
Access Provided by Penn State Univ Libraries at 02/21/13 3:49AM GMTPreference Uncertainty, Preference Learning, and Paired Comparison Experiments -
M. Satterthwaite (1975)
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functionsJournal of Economic Theory, 10
-
B. Day, J. Prades (2010)
Ordering anomalies in choice experimentsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59
-
M. Jeuland, M. Lucas, J. Clemens, D. Whittington (2010)
Estimating the private benefits of vaccination against cholera in Beira, Mozambique: A travel cost approachJournal of Development Economics, 91
-
Christian Vossler, Mary Evans (2009)
Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentialityJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58
-
R. Carson, Nicholas Flores, N. Meade (2000)
Contingent Valuation: Controversies and EvidenceEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 19
-
J. Deshazo (2002)
Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question FormatsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43
-
Okmyung Bin, C. Landry (2012)
Changes in Implicit Flood Risk Premiums: Empirical Evidence from the Housing MarketUrban Research eJournal
-
J. Shogren, J. List, D. Hayes (2000)
Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental AuctionsMicroeconomics: Production
-
P. Slovic (1995)
The Construction of PreferenceAmerican Psychologist, 50
-
R. Cummings, Laura Taylor (1998)
Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation SurveysLand Economics, 74
-
V. Hoffmann, C. Barrett, D. Just (2009)
Do Free Goods Stick to Poor Households? Experimental Evidence on Insecticide Treated BednetsWorld Development, 37
-
I. Bateman, D. Burgess, W. Hutchinson, D. Matthews (2008)
Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrarinessJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55
-
J. Braga, C. Starmer (2005)
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference HypothesisEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 32
-
A. Alberini, K. Boyle, Michael Welsh (2003)
Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertaintyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45
-
G. Parsons (1991)
A NOTE ON CHOICE OF RESIDENTIAL LOCATION IN TRAVEL COST DEMAND MODELSLand Economics, 67
-
Jay Corrigan, A. Drichoutis, R. Weaber, R. Nayga, Matthew Rousu (2012)
Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial CollaborationWiley-Blackwell: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
-
J. Whitehead, C. Dumas, Jim Herstine, Jeffery Hill, Bob Buerger (2008)
Valuing Beach Access and Width with Revealed and Stated Preference DataMarine Resource Economics, 23
-
A. Roth (2004)
Introduction to Experimental Economics -
J. Deshazo, G. Fermo (2002)
Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice ConsistencyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44
-
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
-
R. Cummings, Laura Taylor (1999)
Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodThe American Economic Review, 89
-
C. Landry, J. List (2007)
Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the FieldERN: Experimental Economics (Topic)
-
S. Levitt, J. List (2007)
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real WorldJournal of Economic Perspectives, 21
-
J. Whitehead, T. Haab, Ju-Chin Huang (2000)
Measuring Recreation Benefits of Quality Improvements with Revealed and Stated Behavior DataResource and Energy Economics, 22
-
Jared Carbone, Daniel Hallstrom, V. Smith (2006)
Can Natural Experiments Measure Behavioral Responses to Environmental Risks?Environmental and Resource Economics, 33
-
T. Holmes, R. Kramer (1995)
An Independent Sample Test of Yea-Saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent ValuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29
-
J. Ledyard (1994)
Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental ResearchPublic Economics
-
D. Green, Karen Jacowitz, D. Kahneman, D. McFadden (1998)
Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goodsResource and Energy Economics, 20
-
J. Loomis, E. Ekstrand (1998)
Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owlEcological Economics, 27
-
Bruce Meyer (1994)
Natural and Quasi- Experiments in EconomicsBehavioral & Experimental Finance
-
J. Hoehn, A. Randall (1987)
A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14
-
P. Lachenbruch (1989)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
-
(2011)
So You Want to Run an Experiment, Now What? Some Simple Rules of Thumb for Optimal Experimental Design
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright
- © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2017
- ISBN
- 978-94-007-7103-1
- Pages
- 391 –429
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_10
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[This chapter discusses the role of behavioral experiments in evaluation of individual economic values. Principles of experimental design play a role in application and assessment of non-market valuation methods. Experiments can be employed to assess the formation of preferences and the role of personal characteristics, social factors, and economic constraints on economic values. Experiments can be used to test the efficacy of nonmarket valuation methods and to study the effect of the valuation task, information, and context on valuation responses. We discuss these issues in turn, incorporating pertinent literature, to provide a review and synthesis of experimental methods in valuation.]
Published: Feb 11, 2017
Keywords: Nonmarket valuation; Experiments; Preference formation; Measurement; Valuation efficacy; Contextual effects