Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Dupré (1994)
The disorder of things : metaphysical foundations of the disunity of scienceThe Philosophical Review, 103
Ruth Macklin, K. Popper, J. Eccles (1979)
The Self and Its Brain.The Philosophical Quarterly, 29
Katalin Farkas (2003)
Review: The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World
Jens Harbecke (2009)
Mental Causation: Investigating the Mind's Powers in a Natural World
C. Burt (1960)
GUSTAV THEODOR FECHNER ELEMENTE DER PSYCHOPHYSIK 1860British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 13
M. Schlick (1974)
General theory of knowledge
J. Ladyman, D. Ross (2007)
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized
L. Baker (2000)
Persons and Bodies: The Constitution View Defended
S. Leuenberger (2009)
What is global supervenience?Synthese, 170
Jaegwon Kim (2012)
New Perspectives on Type Identity: The very idea of token physicalism
H. Feigl (1967)
The Mental and the Physical: The Essay and a Postscript
M. Eronen (2013)
Reduction in Philosophy of Mind: A Pluralistic Account
A. Steinberg (2014)
Defining Global SupervenienceErkenntnis, 79
Matthew Haug (2010)
Realization, determination, and mechanismsPhilosophical Studies, 150
Steven Horst (2007)
Beyond Reduction: Philosophy of Mind and Post-Reductionist Philosophy of Science
L. Baker (1997)
Why Constitution Is Not IdentityThe Journal of Philosophy, 94
K. McDaniel (2008)
Against composition as identityAnalysis, 68
M. Kaiser (2011)
The limits of reductionism in the life sciences.History and philosophy of the life sciences, 33 4
[This chapter discusses the relation between conceptual pluralism, dualism, and physicalism. Although I present conceptual pluralism as an alternative to dualism and physicalism, it is important to acknowledge the vagueness of both terms “dualism” and “physicalism”. I suggest that we could use both terms in a very broad sense that includes conceptual pluralism. However, I also argue that philosophers of mind usually use “dualism” and “physicalism” in a narrower sense that is incompatible with conceptual pluralism. Contrary to dualism, conceptual pluralism rejects the idea that mental and physical states are distinct in a metaphysically substantive sense. Contrary to physicalism, conceptual pluralism rejects the ontological priority of the physical.]
Published: Jul 10, 2015
Keywords: Physical Entity; Reductive Explanation; Identity Claim; Global Supervenience; Substantive Sense
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.