Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This is the first of four chapters in this volume dedicated to the copious documentary work of the Scottish philosopher (by academic vocation) John Grierson (1896–1972), the founder and leader of the British documentary movement. In this discussion I offer a close reading of his famous 1926 critique of Flaherty’s Moana (1926). As it represents the ninth definition since 1895 to be presented and discussed in this book, its occasional attribution as the first definition of documentary in history is relegated to the dustbin. A more strenuous, close-range reading of the entire definition reveals how, contrary to appearances, Grierson does not consider “documentary value” to be THE prime (hence, the ultimate) value of Moana, in the same sense that canonical interpretations have consistently argued since. This analysis casts controversial light on the grander philosophical and practical tension between ethics and aesthetics in Grierson’s documentary project, an innate problem for documentariness that the later three chapters on Grierson’s subsequent definitional attempts (Chaps. 16, 18, and 31 herein) will tackle repeatedly.]
Published: Sep 16, 2021
Keywords: Documentary; Value; Of course; Visual account of events; Secondary to its value as; Beautiful as nature is beautiful; Poetic feeling for natural elements
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.