Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alexander Riley (2011)
The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and AgencyContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 40
Richard Boyd (1980)
Materialism without Reductionism: What Physicalism Does Not Entail
Jaegwon Kim, E. Sosa (1993)
Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical EssaysPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56
W. Wimsatt (2006)
Reductionism and its heuristics: Making methodological reductionism honestSynthese, 151
M. Berger, Kathleen Guidroz (2010)
The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy through Race, Class, and Gender
John Miller, S. Page (2007)
Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life
Göktuğ Morçöl (2012)
A Complexity Theory for Public Policy
Mark Granovetter (1985)
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 91
J. Fodor (1974)
Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)Synthese, 28
C. Geertz (1969)
Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and IndonesiaThe Journal of Asian Studies, 28
N. Luhmann (2012)
Introduction to Systems Theory
R. Bhaskar (1993)
Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom
J. Mahoney, K. Thelen (2009)
Explaining Institutional Change: Contributors
D. Hubin, A. Gibbard (1991)
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgement.The Philosophical Quarterly, 41
H. Simon (1991)
The Architecture of Complexity, 106
J. Epstein (2007)
Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton Studies in Complexity)
[This chapter addresses ontologicalontology questions concerning the composition of social structuressocial structures and entities, and their relationships to the actors who compose them. Our theories and ordinary language refer to governmental structures, institutionsinstitutions, and organizationsorganizations at a range of levelscausal powers: actors and officials, agencies, knowledge systems, social networks, and offices and bureaus. The philosophical position of ontological individualism maintains that all social phenomena are ultimately constituted by the social actors who make them up. However, the chapter also recognizes that we need to recognize the reality of higher-level social entities—institutionsinstitutions, normativenormative system systems, social identities, powerpower relations, and social networkssocial networks. The chapter argues that it is legitimate to postulate the existence of social entities; but it argues that social entities, forces, and conditions must have microfoundations at the level of the social actors who compose them. The chapter discusses the idea of a social actor as a socially constituted and socially situated individual with mental frameworks that guide his or her choices of action.]
Published: Jul 8, 2020
Keywords: Agent-based models; Emergence; Generativism; Heterogeneity; Microfoundations; Ontological individualism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.