Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Wc Stone, C. Reeve (1986)
A New Statistical Method for Prediction of Concrete Strength from In-Place TestsCement Concrete and Aggregates, 8
Yuanxun Zheng, Weixing Kong, M. Ji, C. Wan, Ehsan Moshtagh (2020)
Experimental investigation of concrete strength curve based on pull-out post-insert methodInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 16
R. Dilly, W. Ledbetter (1984)
Concrete Strength Based on Maturity and PulloutJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 110
M. Yerner (1994)
Overview and Progressive Finite Element Analysis of Pullout TestsAci Structural Journal, 91
W. Stone, N. Carino, C. Reeve (1986)
Statistical Methods for In-Place Strength Predictions by the Pullout Test, 83
ASTM (2020) Test method for obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete
(2019)
ACI 318 building code requirements for structural concrete
C. Jaegermann (1989)
A simple pull-out test for in situ determination of early strength of concreteMagazine of Concrete Research, 41
P. Bocca (1984)
The application of pull-out test to high strength concrete estimationMatériaux et Construction, 17
(2019)
Test method for pullout strength of hardened concrete
(2019)
ACI 437R strength evaluationof existing concrete buildings
Committee-228 (2019) ACI 228.1R in-place methods to estimate concrete strength
Z. Li, Jigar Desai, Wesley Bullock (2018)
In-Place Estimation of Concrete Compressive Strength Using Postinstalled Pullout Test – A Case StudyJournal of Testing and Evaluation
Hamoud Bishr, Omar AI-Amoudi, I. Basunbul, G. Al-Sulaimani (1995)
Assessment of concrete compressive strength using the Lok testConstruction and Building Materials, 9
Davis Akers, S. Gebler, M. Leming, D. Reddy, M. Arockiasamy, A. Graf, C. Lobo, O. Riley, W. Barringer, Thomas Greene, J. Luciano, J. Shilstone, Gilbert Haddad, Richard Miller, L. Snell, C. Bognacki, K. Hindo, A. Mor, P. Sullivan, Jerrold Brown, R. Jenkins, T. Naik, M. Taylor, R. Dilly, Alfred Kaufman, R. Neal, Derle Thorpe, Donald Dixon, W. Kepler, T. Patzias, R. Vaughan, R. Gaynor, P. Kopac, V. Ramakrishnan, W. Vogt, J. Cook (2010)
Guide for Obtaining Cores and Interpreting Compressive Strength Results
L. Bortolotti (2003)
STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SUBJECTED TO PULLOUT LOADJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15
V. Malhotra (1975)
Evaluation of the pull-out test to determine strength of in-situ concreteMatériaux et Construction, 8
A. Brencich (2015)
A post-installed insert for pull-out tests on concrete up to 70MPaConstruction and Building Materials, 95
B. Jensen, M. Braestrup (1976)
LOK-TESTS DETERMINE THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE, 20
A. Moczko, N. Carino, C. Petersen (2016)
CAPO-TEST to Estimate Concrete Strength in BridgesAci Materials Journal, 113
(2016)
Code requirements for assessment, repair, and rehabilitation of existing concrete structures
M Yener (1994)
Overview and progressive finite element analysis of pullout testsStruct J, 91
N. Carino (1993)
Statistical Methods to Evaluate in-Place Test ResultsSP-141: New Concrete Technology
(1999)
LOK-TEST and CAPO-TEST pullout testing , twenty years experience
Lionello BortolottiI (1990)
Punching Shear Strength in Concrete SlabsAci Structural Journal, 87
NJ Carino (1993)
Statistical methods to evaluate in-place test resultsSpec Publ, 141
D. Jiang, Jingsi Shen (1986)
STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SLABS IN PUNCHING SHEARJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 112
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
A new method of estimating the equivalent specified compressive strength of concrete was proposed in this study. The method involved using a general strength correlation of pullout test to determine the in-place concrete compressive strength and using the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the equivalent specified compressive strength. The accuracy of this proposed new method was studied by comparing the estimation results with the example results presented in the appendices of the report ACI 228.1R. It was determined from this study that among various strength correlation models in the available literature the available Jensen and Braestrup Model best fitted the experimental data presented in ACI 228.1R, and this model could potentially be used as a general strength correlation. The proposed new method and the Alternative Method of ACI 228.1R appeared to give similar estimations of the equivalent specified compressive strength. However, the proposed new method appeared to be a simpler method as it eliminated the need of a job-specific correlation and avoided the complicated statistical analysis. The proposed new method saves time and cost for many projects in their preliminary phases, and could promote the use of NDT in the market. Some future research needs were proposed at the end of this study.
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: In-place concrete strength; Equivalent specified compressive strength; Pullout test; Probabilistic modeling; Monte Carlo simulation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.