Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[When Allen Young returned to New York from the World Youth Festival in Sofia, Bulgaria—a Communist celebration that he had been attending as the Liberation News Service (LNS) split unfolded—he discovered an LNS altogether distinct from that which he had left only a few weeks earlier. Everyone in the office had not only professed a commitment to participatory democracy, but had actually defended democracy by tooth and nail. They had begun to forge a collective.1 That task became all the more central to the LNS identity when LNS, Massachusetts, ceased publication of its competing news service within six months of the split. The status of the LNS outfit in Harlem had been cemented. But work remained. LNSers shared an egalitarian impulse to forge a perfection of Movement democracy in the smithy of LNS’s Harlem basement. But the collective still faced the arduous task of converting that common ideal into a common reality. Because work collectives were just then emerging as viable Movement counterinstitutions, LNS had few reliable models for how a work collective could achieve efficient and humane democratic operations.]
Published: Nov 3, 2015
Keywords: Participatory Democracy; American Activist; Good Politics; Armed Struggle; Movement Democracy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.