Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter and the next, I evaluate nonreligious harm-based arguments against recreational drug use. Again, harm-based arguments ground the wrongness of recreational drug use in a claim about the harm it involves. What differentiates one harm-based argument from another is the type of harm recreational drug use is claimed to involve as well as the alleged subject of the harm. As for the type of harm, it is usually claimed that recreational drug use is physically, psychologically, or socially (including economically) harmful. As for the subject of the harm, it is typically claimed that recreational drug use is harmful to the user (self-regarding harm) or to someone other than the user (other-regarding harm). In this chapter, I evaluate harm-based arguments that focus on self-regarding harm.]
Published: Nov 30, 2015
Keywords: Moral Status; Cognitive Capacity; Illegal Drug; Football Player; Recreational Drug
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.