Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[As one begins to develop a pedagogy based on the work of Habermas, one must start with delineating his views on epistemology. Sposito and Strong, in discussing Habermas’ discursive method, suggest that “[g]etting language that is about the world right is a matter of epistemology; getting a language of community right is a matter of hermeneutics” (1995, p. 283). The distinction becomes clearer as one considers the subjective interpretation of a poem. When one attempts to discern what the poet means, when one reaches beyond one’s immediate reality for interpretation, the process would correlate with the breadth of epistemology. When one reads and feels the poem for one’s self, in a more subjective sense, one would derive meaning from the context of a personalized reality, a hermeneutic approach.]
Published: Dec 17, 2015
Keywords: Critical Pedagogy; Human Interest; Generational Maintenance; Knowledge Embody; Critical Social Science
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.