Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Conspiracy Against ObamacarePostscript and Concluding Thoughts

A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: Postscript and Concluding Thoughts [In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. Sebelius, I authored op-eds for SCOTUSblog, the Washington Examiner, the Daily Beast / Newsweek, and the Washington Post, the last of which is reproduced in previous chapters. All sounded a similar theme: although I was bitterly disappointed by the failure of our legal challenge to bring down the woefully misnamed “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” we were victorious in defeating the expansionist readings of the Constitution that had been offered by the government, and by many law professors, on behalf of the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Conspiracy Against ObamacarePostscript and Concluding Thoughts

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-conspiracy-against-obamacare-postscript-and-concluding-thoughts-1nAfl1umEZ

References (21)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013
ISBN
978-1-137-36374-9
Pages
257 –277
DOI
10.1057/9781137363732_10
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. Sebelius, I authored op-eds for SCOTUSblog, the Washington Examiner, the Daily Beast / Newsweek, and the Washington Post, the last of which is reproduced in previous chapters. All sounded a similar theme: although I was bitterly disappointed by the failure of our legal challenge to bring down the woefully misnamed “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” we were victorious in defeating the expansionist readings of the Constitution that had been offered by the government, and by many law professors, on behalf of the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate.]

Published: Oct 15, 2015

Keywords: Legal Challenge; Federal Power; Oral Argument; Commerce Clause; Chief Justice

There are no references for this article.