A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: Argument
Barnett, Randy E.; Adler, Jonathan H.; Bernstein, David E.; Kerr, Orin S.; Kopel, David B.; Somin, Ilya
2015-10-15 00:00:00
[On Monday, March 26, oral arguments began in NFIB v. Sebelius. The allotted time had been extended from an already unprecedented five-and-a-half hours to six. First up was the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), for which the Court appointed a lawyer, Robert A. Long, to argue that the AIA barred all challenges to the mandate (the Court occasionally appoints lawyers to give arguments that neither party is willing to give).]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-conspiracy-against-obamacare-argument-hSHlsMThgf
[On Monday, March 26, oral arguments began in NFIB v. Sebelius. The allotted time had been extended from an already unprecedented five-and-a-half hours to six. First up was the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), for which the Court appointed a lawyer, Robert A. Long, to argue that the AIA barred all challenges to the mandate (the Court occasionally appoints lawyers to give arguments that neither party is willing to give).]
Published: Oct 15, 2015
Keywords: Collective Action Problem; Medicaid Expansion; Judicial Activism; Actuarial Risk; Federal Power
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.