Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Growth in rural residential housing is broadly considered detrimental to nearby commercial agriculture. This chapter examines the historical relationship between agriculture and rural residential development in Southwestern Oregon, uncovering the contingent nature of this assumed conflict. Rather than conflicting with farming, rural population growth and the marketing of the countryside for an idealized rural lifestyle in the nineteenth and early twentieth century actually provided the needed capital and labor. Thus the passage of statewide land-use regulation in 1973 disrupted the existing land-use management regime by attempting to separate agricultural and residential uses. Local resistance to state land-use regulation reflects this historical mix of land uses. This case has implications for broader debates on the compatibility of different types of rural land uses, namely, consumptive versus extractive industries. The history of land use in Southwestern Oregon suggests that conflicts between extractive and consumptive industries are contingent on the particular uses in question.]
Published: May 27, 2016
Keywords: Orchard agriculture and fruit growing; Oregon Senate Bill 100
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.