Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Standish (2017)
Seeing Connections: From Cats and Classes to Characteristics and Cultures
S. Cavell (1981)
The claim of reason : Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedyThe Journal of Philosophy, 78
P. Smeyers (2017)
“This Is Simply What I Do.” on the Relevance of Wittgenstein’s Alleged Conservatism and the Debate About Cavell’s Legacy for Children and Grown-Ups
P. Hirst, R. Peters, I. Gregory (1971)
The Logic of EducationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 19
L. Wittgenstein, Heikki Nymam, P. Winch (1970)
Culture and Value
Cora Diamond (1991)
The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind
R. Dearden, P. Hirst, R. Peters (2010)
Liberal education and the nature of knowledge
H. Thoreau (1854)
Walden and Civil Disobedience
Barbara Foxley, J. Rousseau (2020)
Emile: Or On Education
P. Standish (2012)
"This is produced by a brain-process!": Wittgenstein, transparency and psychology today : Wittgenstein, transparency and psychology today
P. Standish (1995)
Why we should not speak of an educational scienceStudies in Philosophy and Education, 14
S. Cavell (2010)
Little Did I Know: Excerpts from Memory
P. Standish (1992)
Beyond the Self: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the Limits of Language
Pat White (2012)
Making Political Anger Possible: A Task for Civic EducationJournal of Philosophy of Education, 46
[This essay offers a response to Chap. 16 by SmeyersSmeyers, Paul (2017), entitled: “This is simply what I do.” On the relevance of Wittgenstein’s allegedconservatismConservatismand the debateabout Cavell’sCavell, Stanleylegacy forchildrenChildrenand grown-ups. It answers to Smeyers’ critique of what he identifies as a trend in the reception of Stanley Cavell’sCavell, Stanley work in the philosophyPhilosophy of educationEducation, especially in terms of the bearing this has on the understandingUnderstanding of WittgensteinWittgenstein. Through their preoccupation with the themes of practising freedom differently and departure, and through unrealistic characterisations of the relationship between adults and childrenChildren, SmeyersSmeyers, Paul claims, authors such as Naomi Hodgson, Stefan Ramaekers, Naoko Saito, and Paul StandishStandish, Paul have generated confusions that do justice neither to WittgensteinWittgenstein nor to CavellCavell, Stanley. In particular, they have failed to understand the natureNature and importance of cultural initiationInitiation. The present response takes issue with these claims. It agrees with Smeyers about the importance of cultural initiation but—revisiting questions of authorityAuthority, trainingTraining, childhoodChildhood, and community—argues for a reading of WittgensteinWittgenstein, in part informed by CavellCavell, Stanley, that more accurately accounts for the relationships involved. It also indicates ways in which Cavell moves beyond WittgensteinWittgenstein and thereby revisits the question of what it is to be a grown-up.]
Published: May 4, 2017
Keywords: Authority; Conservatism; Initiation; Training; Cavell; Wittgenstein
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.