Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Tully (1993)
An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts
Michael Temelini (2015)
Wittgenstein and the Study of Politics
James Tully (2000)
Struggles over Recognition and DistributionConstellations, 7
Michael Temelini (2014)
Dialogical approaches to struggles over recognition and distributionCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17
James Tully (2004)
Approaches to Recognition, Power, and DialoguePolitical Theory, 32
L. Wittgenstein (2001)
A certaintyBMJ : British Medical Journal, 323
G. Baker, P. Hacker (1980)
Wittgenstein Understanding and Meaning: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations
James Tully (2004)
Recognition and dialogue: the emergence of a new fieldCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7
D. Owen, James Tully (2007)
Redistribution and Recognition: Two Approaches
James Tully (2001)
Multinational Democracies: Introduction
[My aim is to explain Wittgenstein’s remarks on the epistemologyEpistemology of giving examplesExamples and to consider how this ramifies in the study of politicsPolitics. In parts of The Blue and Brown Books (Preliminary Notebooks)Blue and Brown Books (Preliminary Notebooks) and throughout Philosophical InvestigationsPhilosophical Investigations, one of Wittgenstein’s central epistemological claims is that learningLearning takes place by means of comparing examples, and by practicePractice, rather than by essential definitions or formal abstractable rulesRules. Comparing examplesExamples is not an inferior method of explanation, because we have nothing better. Rather, there is nothing deeper than the examplesExamples. So he says, “let the use teach you the meaningMeaning”. To illustrate how this approach has been mobilized in the study of politicsPolitics, I will consider the writingsWriting of James Tully’sTully, James “aspectivalAspectival” political scienceScience. Tully agrees with Wittgenstein’s refutation of generality and his appreciation for particular cases. He agrees that we learn by practicePractice, and by comparing examplesExamples in dialogue, not rules. Likewise, Tully gives examples, not theories or rulesRules, to explain and to stimulate diversity awareness. These similarities are readily apparent in Strange Multiplicity, and with a sculpture called The Spirit of Haida Gwaii. The artwork is an objectObject of persuasion: to invite negotiation, stimulate diversity awareness, and encourage transformative reconciliationReconciliation.]
Published: May 4, 2017
Keywords: Examples; Dialogical comparison; Epistemology; Aspectival; Reconciliation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.