Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F Langevelde (2000)
Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populationsEcography, 23
LM Bini, JAF Diniz, TFLVB Rangel, TSB Akre, RG Albaladejo, FS Albuquerque, A Aparicio, MD Araújo, A Baselga, J Beck, M Isabel Bellocq, K Böhning-Gaese, PAV Borges, I Castro-Parga, VK Chey, SL Chown, Paulo Marco, DS Dobkin, D Ferrer-Castán, R Field, J Filloy, E Fleishman, JF Gómez, J Hortal, JB Iverson, JT Kerr, W Daniel Kissling, IJ Kitching, JL León-Cortés, JM Lobo, D Montoya, I Morales-Castilla, JC Moreno, T Oberdorff, MÁ Olalla-Tárraga, JG Pausas, H Qian, C Rahbek, MÁ RodrÍguez, M Rueda, A Ruggiero, P Sackmann, NJ Sanders, LC Terribile, OR Vetaas, BA Hawkins (2009)
Coefficient shifts in geographical 565 ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regressionEcography, 32
JD Holland, DG Bert, L Fahrig (2004)
Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitatBioScience, 54
VO Nams (2005)
Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scaleOecologia, 143
SA Coppeto, DA Kelt, DH Vuren, JA Wilson, S Bigelow (2006)
Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra NevadaJ Mammal, 87
RB Cunningham, DB Lindenmayer, M Crane, DR Michael, PS Barton, P Gibbons, S Okada, K Ikin, JAR Stein (2014)
The law of diminishing returns: woodland birds respond to native vegetation cover at multiple spatial scales and over timeDivers Distrib, 20
P Legendre, MRT Dale, M-J Fortin, J Gurevitch, M Hohn, D Myers (2002)
The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveysEcography, 25
TNE Gray, C Phan, B Long (2010)
Modelling species distribution at multiple spatial scales: gibbon habitat preferences in a fragmented landscapeAnim Conserv, 13
S Tenan, RB O’Hara, I Hendriks, G Tavecchia (2014)
Bayesian model selection: the steepest mountain to climbEcol Model, 283
DH Thornton, RJ Fletcher (2014)
Body size and spatial scales in avian response to landscapes: a meta-analysisEcography, 37
S Watanabe (2013)
A widely applicable Bayesian information criterionJ Mach Learn Res, 14
A Gelman, J Hwang, A Vehtari (2014)
Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian modelsStat Comput, 24
JK Horne, DC Schneider (1995)
Spatial variance in ecologyOikos, 12
DL Urban, VO Robert, HH Shugart (1987)
A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patternsBioScience, 37
MG Turner, RV O’Neill, RH Gardner, BT Mine (1989)
Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape patternLandscape Ecol, 3
SA Cushman, K McGarigal (2002)
Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationshipsLandscape Ecol, 17
HB Jackson, L Fahrig (2015)
Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale?Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 24
SE Pope, L Fahrig, H Gray Merriam (2000)
Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populationsEcology, 81
MS Boyce (2006)
Scale for resource selection functionsDivers Distrib, 12
BK Williams, JD Nichols, MJ Conroy (2002)
Analysis and management of animal populations
KP Mccarthy, RJ Fletcher, CT Rota, RL Hutto (2012)
Predicting species distributions from samples collected along roadsidesConserv Biol, 26
WS Robinson (1950)
Ecological correlations and the behavior of individualsAm Sociol Rev, 15
J Grand, SA Cushman (2003)
A multi-scale analysis of species-environment relationships: breeding birds in a pitch pine-scrub oak (Pinus rigida–Quercus ilicifolia) communityBiol Conserv, 112
G Guillera-Arroita, JJ Lahoz-Monfort José, DI MacKenzie, BA Wintle, MA McCarthy (2014)
Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘fitting and interpreting occupancy models’PLoS ONE, 9
JJ Lennon (2000)
Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecologyEcography, 23
JM Chase, JA Myers (2011)
Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scalesPhilos Trans R Soc Lond, 366
RB O’Hara, MJ Sillanpää (2009)
A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and whichBayesian Anal, 4
RL Hutto, SM Pletschet, P Hendricks (1986)
A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season useAuk, 12
V Saab (1999)
Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysisEcol Appl, 9
M Wheatley, C Johnson (2009)
Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scaleEcol Complex, 6
K Būhning-Gaese (1997)
Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scalesJ Biogeogr, 24
JL Dungan, JN Perry, MRT Dale, P Legendre, S Citron-Pousty, M-J Fortin, A Jakomulska, M Miriti, MS Rosenberg (2002)
A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysisEcography, 25
AD Chalfoun, TE Martin (2007)
Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitnessJ Appl Ecol, 44
MB Hooten, NT Hobbs (2015)
A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologistsEcol Monogr, 85
I Kuhn (2007)
Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patternsDivers Distrib, 13
SA Levin (1992)
The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lectureEcology, 73
CP Kirol, JL Beck, SV Huzurbazar, MJ Holloran, SN Miller (2015)
Identifying greater Sage-Grouse source and sink habitats for conservation planning in an energy development landscapeEcol Appl, 25
I Steffan-Dewenter, U Münzenberg, C Bürger, C Thies, T Tscharntke (2002)
Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guildsEcology, 83
DS Johnson, JA Hoeting (2011)
Bayesian multimodel inference for geostatistical regression modelsPLoS ONE, 6
TH Keitt, ON Bjornstad, PM Dixon, S Citron-Pousty (2002)
Accounting for spatial pattern when modeling organism-environment interactionsEcography, 25
GM Henebry (1995)
Spatial model error analysis using autocorrelation indexesEcol Model, 82
CF Jorgensen, LA Powell, JJ Lusk, AA Bishop, JJ Fontaine (2014)
Assessing landscape constraints on species abundance: does the neighborhood limit species response to local habitat conservation programs?PLoS ONE, 9
B Sandel, AB Smith (2009)
Scale as a lurking factor: incorporating scale-dependence in experimental ecologyOikos, 118
MW Schwartz, LR Iverson, AM Prasad, SN Matthews, RJ O’Connor (2006)
Predicting extinctions as a result of climate changeEcology, 87
L Anselin, DA Griffith (1988)
Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis?Pap Reg Sci, 65
AH Hurlbert, W Jetz (2007)
Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservationProc Natl Acad Sci, 104
A Guisan, W Thuiller (2005)
Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat modelsEcol Lett, 8
JA Royle (2004)
N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated countsBiometrics, 60
SJ Godsill (2001)
On the relationship between Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for model uncertaintyJ Comput Graph Stat, 10
H Akaike (1998)
Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike
P Clifford, S Richardson, D Hémon (1989)
Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processesBiometrics, 12
KP Overmars, GHJ Koning, A Veldkamp (2003)
Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use modelsEcol Model, 164
HJ Knegt, FV Langevelde, MB Coughenour, AK Skidmore, WF Boer, IMA Heitkönig, NM Knox, C Waal, HHT Prins (2010)
Spatial autocorrelation and the scaling of species-environment relationshipsEcology, 91
KF Kellner, RK Swihart (2014)
Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative reviewPLoS ONE, 9
RG Pearson, TP Dawson, C Liu (2004)
Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover dataEcography, 27
Landscape Ecol (2017) 32:2365–2381 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0575-y RESEARCH AR TIC L E A Bayesian method for assessing multi-scale species-habitat relationships . . Erica F. Stuber Lutz F. Gruber Joseph J. Fontaine Received: 9 December 2016 / Accepted: 15 September 2017 / Published online: 3 October 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Abstract spatial scales of predictors using latent scale indicator Context Scientists face several theoretical and variables that are estimated with reversible-jump methodological challenges in appropriately describing Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. BLISS does fundamental wildlife-habitat relationships in models. not suffer from collinearity, and substantially reduces The spatial scales of habitat relationships are often computation time of studies. We present a simulation unknown, and are expected to follow a multi-scale study to validate our method and apply our method to a hierarchy. Typical frequentist or information theoretic case-study of land cover predictors for ring-necked approaches often suffer under collinearity in multi- pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) abundance in scale studies, fail to converge when models are Nebraska, USA. complex or represent an intractable computational Results Our method returns accurate descriptions of burden when candidate model sets are large. the explanatory power of multiple spatial scales, and Objectives Our objective was to implement an
Landscape Ecology – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 3, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.