Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting”

Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results... Hernia (2021) 25:1375–1376 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02455-z COMMENT Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting” 1 1 P. Szasz  · F. Spencer Netto  on behalf of Shouldice Hospital Received: 14 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published online: 7 July 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2021 We commend Lorenz et al. [1] on their recent publication disagreement amongst participants in the study, we support in continuing to foster a renewed international interest in the use of a non-absorbable monofilament running material non-mesh inguinal hernia techniques. Although we have rather than absorbable material. Furthermore, as no specific apprehensions regarding some topics discussed, these will indications in terms of size were met with consensus, it is be more fully addressed in an upcoming publication. our experience that direct and indirect groin hernia types— We support the notion that the outcome of a procedure regardless of size—are good candidates for a tissue repair. is based on the technical skill and experience of the sur- We regularly perform this repair on large and massive scrotal geon. This has been shown for various types of surgeries hernias with no difference in peri-operative or http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Hernia Springer Journals

Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting”

Hernia , Volume 25 (5) – Oct 1, 2021

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journal/shouldice-hospital-comments-on-shouldice-standard-2020-review-of-JkkEjJj2yQ
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2021
ISSN
1265-4906
eISSN
1248-9204
DOI
10.1007/s10029-021-02455-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Hernia (2021) 25:1375–1376 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02455-z COMMENT Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting” 1 1 P. Szasz  · F. Spencer Netto  on behalf of Shouldice Hospital Received: 14 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published online: 7 July 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2021 We commend Lorenz et al. [1] on their recent publication disagreement amongst participants in the study, we support in continuing to foster a renewed international interest in the use of a non-absorbable monofilament running material non-mesh inguinal hernia techniques. Although we have rather than absorbable material. Furthermore, as no specific apprehensions regarding some topics discussed, these will indications in terms of size were met with consensus, it is be more fully addressed in an upcoming publication. our experience that direct and indirect groin hernia types— We support the notion that the outcome of a procedure regardless of size—are good candidates for a tissue repair. is based on the technical skill and experience of the sur- We regularly perform this repair on large and massive scrotal geon. This has been shown for various types of surgeries hernias with no difference in peri-operative or

Journal

HerniaSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 2021

References