“Whoa! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

Brodifacoum Poisoning of Avian Scavengers During Rat Control on a Seabird Colony



Langara Island, at the north-western tip of British Columbia's Queen Charlotte archipelago, was once nesting grounds for an estimated 500,000 seabirds. However, infestations of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and their predation of eggs and breeding adults have caused extirpation or serious declines of all seabird species. By 1993, the breeding population of ancient murrelets (Synthliboramphus antiquus) had declined to 10% of its historical size. Successful eradication of rats on smaller New Zealand islands using the anticoagulant brodifacoum prompted its application on Langara Island. The island is also home to breeding bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), and other wildlife. No comprehensive studies of non-target impacts and potential for secondary poisoning were done during similar operations elsewhere; thus, in 1994 and 1995 we initiated a two-year study into the risk of secondary poisoning to non-target species. During 1994, rat carcasses were laid out with motion sensor cameras to identify potential scavengers. Ravens, northwestern crows and bald eagles were photographed at carcasses, and therefore at risk of feeding on rats that die above ground. During the baiting program, 19 rats were radio-tagged to determine the proportion dying above ground, and thus available to predators/scavengers. Ravens were found poisoned both from feeding directly on the bait, and predating/scavenging poisoned rats. Bald eagles were trapped and blood sampled for brodifacoum residue analysis and prothrombin time evaluation; 15% of the sampled population showed detectable residues but no adversely-affected birds were found. We conclude that the use of brodifacoum for rat removal on seabird islands poses a clear risk of secondary poisoning to avian scavengers. This risk must be weighed against the benefit of rat removal programs.



EcotoxicologySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 1, 1999

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008951701780

Free Preview of First Page

Loading next page...

You're reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

And millions more from thousands of peer-reviewed journals, for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

To be the best researcher, you need access to the best research

  • With DeepDyve, you can stop worrying about how much articles cost, or if it's too much hassle to order — it's all at your fingertips. Your research is important and deserves the top content.
  • Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.
  • All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

Stop missing out on the latest updates in your field

  • We’ll send you automatic email updates on the keywords and journals you tell us are most important to you.
  • There is a lot of content out there, so we help you sift through it and stay organized.