“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Try 2 weeks free now

Brodifacoum Poisoning of Avian Scavengers During Rat Control on a Seabird Colony



Langara Island, at the north-western tip of British Columbia's Queen Charlotte archipelago, was once nesting grounds for an estimated 500,000 seabirds. However, infestations of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and their predation of eggs and breeding adults have caused extirpation or serious declines of all seabird species. By 1993, the breeding population of ancient murrelets (Synthliboramphus antiquus) had declined to 10% of its historical size. Successful eradication of rats on smaller New Zealand islands using the anticoagulant brodifacoum prompted its application on Langara Island. The island is also home to breeding bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), and other wildlife. No comprehensive studies of non-target impacts and potential for secondary poisoning were done during similar operations elsewhere; thus, in 1994 and 1995 we initiated a two-year study into the risk of secondary poisoning to non-target species. During 1994, rat carcasses were laid out with motion sensor cameras to identify potential scavengers. Ravens, northwestern crows and bald eagles were photographed at carcasses, and therefore at risk of feeding on rats that die above ground. During the baiting program, 19 rats were radio-tagged to determine the proportion dying above ground, and thus available to predators/scavengers. Ravens were found poisoned both from feeding directly on the bait, and predating/scavenging poisoned rats. Bald eagles were trapped and blood sampled for brodifacoum residue analysis and prothrombin time evaluation; 15% of the sampled population showed detectable residues but no adversely-affected birds were found. We conclude that the use of brodifacoum for rat removal on seabird islands poses a clear risk of secondary poisoning to avian scavengers. This risk must be weighed against the benefit of rat removal programs.



EcotoxicologySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 1, 1999

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008951701780

Free Preview of First Page

Loading next page...

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy unlimited access and
personalized recommendations from
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $40/month

Try 2 weeks free now

Explore the DeepDyve Library

How DeepDyve Works

Spend time researching, not time worrying you’re buying articles that might not be useful.

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Simple and Affordable Pricing

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches


Best Deal — 25% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 25% off!
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

billed annually