Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sigal Barsade, O. O'Neill (2014)
What’s Love Got to Do with It? A Longitudinal Study of the Culture of Companionate Love and Employee and Client Outcomes in a Long-term Care SettingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 59
A. Galinsky, G. Moskowitz (2000)
Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.Journal of personality and social psychology, 78 4
Adam Grant, James Berry (2011)
Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and CreativityEncyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
K. Klein, S. Kozlowski (2000)
From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 3
D. Chan (1998)
Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition ModelsJournal of Applied Psychology, 83
Cynthia Wang, Tai Kenneth, Gillian Ku, A. Galinsky (2014)
Perspective-Taking Increases Willingness to Engage in Intergroup ContactPLoS ONE, 9
Sigal Barsade, D. Gibson (2012)
Group AffectCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 21
E. Caruso, Nicholas Epley, M. Bazerman (2004)
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Perspective Taking in GroupsBehavioral & Experimental Economics
Jacob Cohen, P. Cohen, S. West, L. Aiken (1979)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
Jeffrey LePine, J. Hollenbeck, Daniel Ilgen, Jennifer Hedlund (1997)
Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than gJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
B. Beersma, A. Homan, G. Kleef, C. Dreu (2013)
Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121
A. Galinsky, William Maddux, Debra Gilin, Judith White (2008)
Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your OpponentPsychological Science, 19
P. Totterdell, S. Kellett, Katja Teuchmann, R. Briner (1998)
Evidence of mood linkage in work groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74
Mark Davis, Miles Davis, M. Davis, Matthew Davis, Mark Davis, Mm Davis, M. Davis, F. Davis, H. Davis, I. Davis (1980)
A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy
R. Cialdini, Stephanie Brown, B. Lewis, Carol Luce, Steven Neuberg (1997)
Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness.Journal of personality and social psychology, 73 3
J. Forgas, J. George (2001)
Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing PerspectiveOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86
Sigal Barsade (2002)
The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group BehaviorAdministrative Science Quarterly, 47
Jochen Menges, M. Kilduff (2015)
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and ProcessesThe Academy of Management Annals, 9
R. Wageman (1995)
Interdependence and Group EffectivenessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
Gillian Ku, Cynthia Wang, A. Galinsky (2015)
The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizationsResearch in Organizational Behavior, 35
S. Lyubomirsky, S. Nolen-Hoeksema (1995)
Effects of self-focused rumination on negative thinking and interpersonal problem solving.Journal of personality and social psychology, 69 1
L. Barrett, J. Russell (1998)
Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74
M. Marks, J. Mathieu, S. Zaccaro (2001)
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team ProcessesAcademy of Management Review, 26
J. George (1990)
Personality, affect, and behavior in groups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
C. Dreu, B. Nijstad, D. Knippenberg (2008)
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision MakingPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 12
C. Axtell, S. Parker, D. Holman, P. Totterdell (2007)
Enhancing customer service: Perspective taking in a call centreEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16
A. Galinsky, Gillian Ku, Cynthia Wang (2005)
Perspective-Taking and Self-Other Overlap: Fostering Social Bonds and Facilitating Social CoordinationGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8
B. Beersma, J. Hollenbeck, Stephen Humphrey, Henry Moon, Donald Conlon, Daniel Ilgen (2003)
Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency ApproachAcademy of Management Journal, 46
Brian Dineen, R. Noe, J. Shaw, M. Duffy, C. Wiethoff (2007)
LEVEL AND DISPERSION OF SATISFACTION IN TEAMS: USING FOCI AND SOCIAL CONTEXT TO EXPLAIN THE SATISFACTION-ABSENTEEISM RELATIONSHIPAcademy of Management Journal, 50
Daniel Ilgen, J. Hollenbeck, Michael Johnson, Dustin Jundt (2005)
ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
S. Gully, Kara Incalcaterra, Aparna Joshi, J. Beauien (2002)
A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 5
Mark Davis (1983)
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44
Sigal Barsade, D. Gibson (2007)
Why Does Affect Matter in OrganizationsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 21
I. Hoever, D. Knippenberg, Wendy Ginkel, H. Barkema (2010)
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.The Journal of applied psychology, 97 5
R. Dodhia (2005)
A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.)Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30
Marc Heerdink, Gerben Kleef, A. Homan, A. Fischer (2013)
On the social influence of emotions in groups: interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance.Journal of personality and social psychology, 105 2
J. Russell, L. Barrett (1999)
Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant.Journal of personality and social psychology, 76 5
Christian Nagel (2000)
Cognitive load and perspective‐taking: applying the automatic‐controlled distinction to verbal communicationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 30
J. Hollenbeck, Henry Moon, Aleksander Ellis, Bradley West, Daniel Ilgen, L. Sheppard, C. Porter, J. Wagner (2002)
Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 3
J. Hollenbeck, B. Beersma, M. Schouten (2012)
Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team DescriptionAcademy of Management Review, 37
G. Kleef, A. Homan, B. Beersma, D. Knippenberg, B. Knippenberg, F. Damen (2009)
Searing sentiment or cold calculation? the effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivationJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
M. Schippers, D. Hartog, P. Koopman, Janique Wienk (2003)
Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivityJournal of Organizational Behavior, 24
Matthew Grawitch, D. Munz, T. Kramer (2003)
Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7
Ken Smith, Ken Smith, Judy Olian, H. Sims, Douglas O'Bannon, J. Scully (1994)
Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and CommunicationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
Roman Trötschel, J. Hüffmeier, David Loschelder, Katja Schwartz, P. Gollwitzer (2011)
Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: when putting oneself into the opponent's shoes helps to walk toward agreements.Journal of personality and social psychology, 101 4
J. Mathieu, M. Maynard, Tammy Rapp, L. Gilson (2008)
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the FutureJournal of Management, 34
D. Keltner, J. Haidt (1999)
Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of AnalysisCognition & Emotion, 13
Seth Kaplan, Jill Bradley, Joseph Luchman, Douglas Haynes (2009)
On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: a meta-analytic investigation.The Journal of applied psychology, 94 1
J. Pruessner, D. Hellhammer, C. Kirschbaum (1999)
Burnout, perceived stress, and cortisol responses to awakening.Psychosomatic medicine, 61 2
A. Galinsky, Cynthia Wang, Gillian Ku (2008)
Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically.Journal of personality and social psychology, 95 2
Gillian Ku, Cynthia Wang, A. Galinsky (2010)
Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behaviorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46
B. Barry, R. Friedman (1998)
Bargainer Characteristics in Distributive and Integrative NegotiationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74
Michael Johnson, J. Hollenbeck, Stephen Humphrey, Daniel Ilgen, Dustin Jundt, C. Meyer (2006)
Cutthroat Cooperation: Asymmetrical Adaptation To Changes In Team Reward StructuresAcademy of Management Journal, 49
M. Bechtoldt, C. Dreu, B. Nijstad, D. Zapf (2010)
Self-concept clarity and the management of social conflict.Journal of personality, 78 2
M. Bechtoldt, B. Beersma, S. Rohrmann, J. Sanchez-Burks (2013)
A gift that takes its toll: Emotion recognition and conflict appraisalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22
A. Knight, Noah Eisenkraft (2015)
Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 100 4
(1972)
Group processes and productivity
W. Ginkel, D. Knippenberg (2008)
Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105
Nai‐Wen Chi, Yen Chung, Wei-Chi Tsai (2011)
How Do Happy Leaders Enhance Team Success? The Mediating Roles of Transformational Leadership, Group Affective Tone, and Team Processes†Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41
Murray Barrick, G. Stewart, M. Neubert, M. Mount (1998)
Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
R. Lazarus, S. Folkman (2020)
Stress: Appraisal and CopingEncyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
M. Bechtoldt, Vanessa Schneider (2016)
Predicting stress from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings: Emotional intelligence and testosterone jointly predict cortisol reactivity.Emotion, 16 6
S. Gully, Dennis Devine, D. Whitney (1995)
A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and PerformanceSmall Group Research, 26
M. Bechtoldt, S. Rohrmann, Irene Pater, B. Beersma (2011)
The primacy of perceiving: emotion recognition buffers negative effects of emotional labor.The Journal of applied psychology, 96 5
Gerben Kleef (2009)
How Emotions Regulate Social LifeCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 18
L. Moynihan, R. Peterson (2001)
7. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groupsResearch in Organizational Behavior, 23
J. Mathieu, T. Heffner, G. Goodwin, E. Salas, J. Cannon-Bowers (2000)
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 2
Whereas the positive relationship between positive affect in teams and team performance is well established, the relationship between team negative affect and team performance seems to be subject to moderating effects. We focus on the effects of perspective taking as one of these moderators, and posit that perspective taking impedes team performance when team state affect is negative because team members become preoccupied with others’ negative emotions. Results from 49 teams involved in a computerized interactive decision-making task support our hypothesis: Negative state affect was negatively related to performance for teams high in perspective taking, but not for teams low in perspective taking. This leads to the conclusion that when teams experience high negative affect, they benefit from low perspective taking.
Small Group Behavior – SAGE
Published: Jun 7, 2018
Keywords: teams; negative affect; positive affect; perspective taking; performance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.