Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and StatisticsJournal of Marketing Research, 18
W. Perreault, Forrest Young (1980)
Alternating Least Squares Optimal Scaling: Analysis of Nonmetric Data in Marketing ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 17
(1975)
Six Models with Two Blocks of Observabies as Indicators for One or Two Latent Variables,
M. Stone (1976)
Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical PredictionsJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 36
(1980)
The Geometric Meaning of Soft Modeling with Some Generalizations
(1972)
An Investigation of the Reduced Fixed-Point Method," seminar paper. Department of Statistics, University of Uppsala, Sweden
R. Noonan, H. Wold (1977)
NIPALS Path Modelling with Latent VariablesScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 21
Richard Sands, Forrest Young (1980)
Component models for three-way data: An alternating least squares algorithm with optimal scaling featuresPsychometrika, 45
(1980)
Factors Influencing the Outcome of Economic Sanctions: An Application of Soft Modeling
P. Bentler (1976)
Multistructure Statistical Model Applied To Factor Analysis.Multivariate behavioral research, 11 1
(1968)
On the Fixed-Point Property of Wold's Iterative Estimation Method for Principal Components,
(1981)
LVPLS 1.6: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least-Squares Estimation, University of the Federal Armed Forces, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany
K. Jöreskog, H. Wold (1982)
Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction
(1974)
Recursive Fixed-Point Estimation: Theory and Application, published doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics
(1981)
Fomell, ed
(1980)
A Path Model of Consumer Complaint Behavior,
(1977)
Simulation sozio-okonomischer Zusammanhange-Kritik and Modification von Systems Analysis, doctoral
for the treatment
O. Driel (1978)
On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysisPsychometrika, 43
An Overview of Latent Variables Path Analysis
C. Phillips (1971)
Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance
J. Leeuw, Forrest Young, Y. Takane (1976)
Additive structure in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling featuresPsychometrika, 41
R. Hauser (1972)
Disaggregating a social-psychological model of educational attainmentSocial Science Research, 1
D. Stapleton (1978)
Analyzing Political Participation Data with a Mimic ModelSociological Methodology, 9
Least Squares-Part II
(1981)
Chemical Systems under Indirect Observation
John Miller (1975)
The Sampling Distribution and a Test for the Significance of the Bimultivariate Redundancy Statistic: A Monte Carlo Study.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10
H. Wold (1974)
Causal flows with latent variables: Partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modellingEuropean Economic Review, 5
A. Best, A. Andreasen (1977)
Consumer Response to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints, and Obtaining RedressLaw & Society Review, 11
(1981)
Larcker (1981a), "Evaluating Stmctural
J. Steiger (1979)
Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallelsPsychometrika, 44
(1981)
Measuring Joint Advertis
Baldwin Hui (1978)
THE PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES APPROACH TO PATH MODELS OF INDIRECTLY OBSERVED VARIABLES WITH MULTIPLE INDICATORS.
R. Bagozzi, C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Canonical Correlation Analysis As A Special Case Of A Structural Relations Model.Multivariate behavioral research, 16 4
F. Bookstein (1980)
Data Analysis by Partial Least Squares
Louis Schwartz, A. Hirschman (1972)
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and StatesUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 120
J. Carroll, S. Pruzansky, J. Kruskal (1980)
Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parametersPsychometrika, 45
S. Geisser (1974)
A predictive approach to the random effect modelBiometrika, 61
K. Jöreskog (1970)
A general method for analysis of covariance structuresBiometrika, 57
C. Fornell (1982)
A second generation of multivariate analysis
S. Mulaik (1976)
Comments on “the measurement of factorial indeterminacy”Psychometrika, 41
P. Kroonenberg, J. Leeuw (1980)
Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithmsPsychometrika, 45
E. Lyttkens (1973)
The Fix‐Point Method for Estimating Interdependent Systems with the Underlying Model Specification, 136
R. Noonan (1982)
School Environments and School Outcomes: An Empirical Comparative Study Using the IEA Data
(1963)
Toward a Verdict on Macroeconomic Simultaneous Equations,
(1980)
An Elegant New/Old Approach to Estimating Path Models (Structural Equation Models) with Unobserved Variables
H. Wold (1981)
The Fix-point approach to interdependent systems
B. Green (1976)
On the factor score controversyPsychometrika, 41
S. Mulaik, R. Mcdonald (1978)
The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factorPsychometrika, 43
C. Fornell, W. Robinson (1983)
Industrial Organization and Consumer Satisfaction-DissatisfactionJournal of Consumer Research, 9
William Darden, R. Bagozzi (1980)
Causal Models in MarketingJournal of Marketing Research, 18
(1981)
PLS-Modeling and Estimation of Politimetric Models
(1978)
LlSREL IV: Analysis ofLinear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood
In marketing applications of structural equation models with unobservable variables, researchers have relied almost exclusively on LISREL for parameter estimation. Apparently they have been little concerned about the frequent inability of marketing data to meet the requirements for maximum likelihood estimation or the common occurrence of improper solutions in LISREL modeling. The authors demonstrate that partial least squares (PLS) can be used to overcome these two problems. PLS is somewhat less well-grounded than LISREL in traditional statistical and psychometric theory. The authors show, however, that under certain model specifications the two methods produce the same results. In more general cases, the methods provide results which diverge in certain systematic ways. These differences are analyzed and explained in terms of the underlying objectives of each method.
Journal of Marketing Research – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.