Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Cronbach, G. Gleser (1958)
Psychological tests and personnel decisionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 53
R. Levine, F. Lord (1958)
An Index of the Discriminating Power of a Test at Different Parts of the Score RangeEducational and Psychological Measurement, 19
(1932)
Handbook of Statistical Tables, Nomographs, and Formulas
W. Thompson (1963)
PRECISION OF SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT PROCEDURESJournal of the American Statistical Association, 58
F. Lord (1962)
Formula Scoring and ValidityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 23
L. Cronbach, G. Gleser (1959)
Interpretation of reliability and validity coefficients: Remarks on a paper by Lord.Journal of Educational Psychology, 50
H. Gulliksen (1952)
Theory of mental tests
H. Kaiser (1960)
Directional statistical decisions.Psychological review, 67
L. Cronbach, Nageswari Rajaratnam, G. Gleser (1963)
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16
M. Woodbury (1951)
On the standard length of a testPsychometrika, 16
R. Jackson (1939)
RELIABILITY OF MENTAL TESTSThe British journal of psychology. General section, 29
L. Cronbach, H. Azuma (1962)
Internal-Consistency Reliability Formulas Applied to Randomly Sampled Single-Factor Tests: an Empirical ComparisonEducational and Psychological Measurement, 22
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT Vol. 1964 XXIV, No. 3, IN THE COMPARISON THE RATIO SIGNAL/NOISE OF RELIABILITY COEFFICIENTS C. GLESER 1 LEE J. CRONBACH AND GOLDINE of Illinois University FROM time to to or supple- time, investigators propose replace ment the correlational index of test with some other reliability (r) index related index with to it. One monotonically suggested par- ticular is some transformation of this ratio. or frequency r) r/(1 - Its as an index root was forward Jackson square put (1939) by of of in the first of analysis &dquo;sensitivity&dquo; published application variance to test &dquo;standard of test&dquo; length theory. Woodbury’s is calculated from which he calls the &dquo;amount (1951) r/ ( 1 - r), of information&dquo; in the test. Gulliksen a seeking (1950, p. 85), function of test &dquo;invariant with to in reliability respect changes test showed that the ratio - the length,&dquo; (1 r) /r multiplied by number of items has this In none of these has it property. papers been made clear what is to be the entirely gained by changing correlational index to such have another and transformations form, been in used on tests. This note is intended to make rarely reports clear
Educational and Psychological Measurement – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 1964
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.