Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Cepeda, Juan Africano, Rodolfo Polo, R. Alcalá, D. Carr (2003)
What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?Pain, 105
W. Hall (1981)
On “Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors”Pain, 11
J. Bland, D. Altman (1996)
Transforming data.BMJ, 312 7033
E. Ludington, F. Dexter (1998)
Statistical Analysis of Total Labor Pain Using the Visual Analog Scale and Application to Studies of Analgesic Effectiveness During ChildbirthAnesthesia & Analgesia, 87
W Downie, P. Leatham, V. Rhind, V. Wright, J Branco, J Anderson (1978)
Studies with pain rating scales.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 37
Lauren DeLoach, M. Higgins, Amy Caplan, J. Stiff (1998)
The Visual Analog Scale in the Immediate Postoperative Period: Intrasubject Variability and Correlation with a Numeric ScaleAnesthesia & Analgesia, 86
P. Myles, Sally Troedel, Michael Boquest, M. Reeves (1999)
The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear?Anesthesia and analgesia, 89 6
C. Bodian, G. Freedman, S. Hossain, J. Eisenkraft, Y. Beilin (2001)
The Visual Analog Scale for Pain: Clinical Significance in Postoperative PatientsAnesthesiology, 95
A. Carlsson (1983)
Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scalePain, 16
F. Dexter, D. Chestnut (1995)
Analysis of Statistical Tests to Compare Visual Analog Scale Measurements among GroupsAnesthesiology, 82
Puntillo Ka (1993)
Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma.Nursing dynamics, 2 3
S. Revill, J. Robinson, M. Rosen, M. Hogg (1976)
The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating painAnaesthesia, 31
S. Mantha, R. Thisted, J. Foss, J. Ellis, M. Roizen (1993)
A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance.Anesthesia and analgesia, 77 5
M. Jensen, P. Karoly, S. Braver (1986)
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methodsPain, 27
A. Moore, O. Moore, H. McQuay, D. Gavaghan (1997)
Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scalesPain, 69
S. Collins, R. Moore, H. McQuay (1997)
The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?PAIN, 72
W. Campbell, Christopher Patterson (1998)
Quantifying meaningful changes in painAnaesthesia, 53
D. Price, F. Bush, S. Long, S. Harkins (1994)
A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scalesPain, 56
B. Philip (1990)
Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale.Anesthesia and analgesia, 71 6
E. Huskisson (1974)
Measurement of pain.Lancet, 2 7889
(1991)
Single-dose analgesic comparisons
F. Aubrun, O. Langeron, C. Quesnel, P. Coriat, B. Riou (2003)
Relationships between Measurement of Pain Using Visual Analog Score and Morphine Requirements during Postoperative Intravenous Morphine TitrationAnesthesiology, 98
M. Bland, D. Altman (1996)
Statistics Notes: Transforming dataBMJ, 312
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a standard measurement tool in pain research and clinical practice, and has been shown to have linear scale properties for mild to moderate pain. Our aim was to evaluate the scaling properties of the VAS in subjects with severe acute pain. After Ethics Committee approval we studied 22 patients and asked them to rate the severity of their pain on a 100 mm VAS at the initial assessment (VAS1), and again after administration of analgesic medication. The subject was asked to nominate when they considered their pain intensity had halved, and at this time they were asked to rate this on a second VAS (VAS0.5). When the subject had received satisfactory relief of their pain, they were asked to describe how much their pain had been relieved and were then asked to rate their final pain state using a third VAS (VASfinal). The mean (SD) scores were VAS1 84 (14) (range 56–100), VAS0.5 42 (13) and VASfinal 21 (16). The mean (95% CI) for VASratio was 0.51 (0.45–0.57). The mean (SD) patients’ estimate of pain relief was 77 (21)% from that of baseline, with a mean (SD) VASfinal 0.26 (0.20), 95% CI 0.17–0.38. The correlation of the patients’ estimate of pain relief with the VASfinal was r=0.89, rho=0.87, both P<0.001. The VAS is a linear scale in subjects with severe acute pain. Changes in the VAS score represent a relative change in the magnitude of pain sensation.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.