Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Bollerslev, J. Wooldridge (1992)
Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariancesEconometric Reviews, 11
Jin-Ray Lu, Pei-Hsuan Lee, I-Yuan Chuang (2011)
Estimation of oil firm's systematic risk via composite time-varying modelsMath. Comput. Simul., 81
R. Engle (1982)
Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflationEconometrica, 50
The dummy variable, when included in Equation (7), is found to be positive and significant at 1 per cent. Also, we find that the coefficient c 3 is negative and significant at 1 per cent
Andrew Christie (1982)
The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: value
(2014)
Qatar's country report
Chris Brooks, Ó. Henry, G. Persand (2002)
The effect of asymmetries on optimal hedge ratiosThe Journal of Business, 75
R. Brooks, R. Faff, M. Mckenzie (2002)
Time varying country risk: an assessment of alternative modelling techniquesThe European Journal of Finance, 8
G. Koutmos, J. Knif (2002)
Time variation and asymmetry in systematic risk: evidence from the Finnish stock exchangeJournal of Multinational Financial Management, 12
R. Engle, Kenneth Kroner (1995)
Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCHEconometric Theory, 11
G. Schwert, Paul Seguin (1989)
Heteroskedasticity in Stock ReturnsNBER Working Paper Series
Hisham Refai, M. Eissa, Rami Zeitun (2017)
Asymmetric volatility and conditional expected returnsInternational Journal of Emerging Markets, 12
K. Liow (2007)
The Dynamics of Return Volatilty and Systematic Risk in International Real Estate Security MarketsJournal of Property Research, 24
Jian Zhou (2013)
Conditional market beta for REITs: A comparison of modeling techniquesEconomic Modelling, 30
The diagnostics on the standardised residuals for the conventional SS model and GARCH (1,1) model of Reyes (1999) show significant serial correlations and ARCH effects
According to Qatar Central Bank, the exchange rate between the Qatari Riyal and the US dollar is fixed at QR3.64/US. Therefore, the market capitalization is approximately USD 166 billion
G. Bekaert, Guojun Wu (1997)
Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity MarketsCorporate Finance: Valuation
M. Ibrahim (2004)
TIME-VARYING BETA AND VOLATILITY IN THE KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGEGadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6
Hisham Refai, M. Eissa (2017)
The impact of FIFA’s official announcements on the stock market of Qatar: The case of the 2022 World CupResearch in International Business and Finance, 41
Phillip Braun, Daniel Nelson, Alain Sunier (1995)
Good News, Bad News, Volatility, and BetasJournal of Finance, 50
Shamila Jayasuriya, W. Shambora, R. Rossiter (2009)
Asymmetric Volatility in Emerging and Mature MarketsJournal of Emerging Market Finance, 8
Daniel Nelson (1991)
CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY IN ASSET RETURNS: A NEW APPROACHEconometrica, 59
T. Bollerslev, R. Engle, J. Wooldridge (1988)
A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying CovariancesJournal of Political Economy, 96
Y. Wang (2005)
The Cross Sectional Relationship between Stock Returns and Domestic and Global Factors in the Chinese A Share Market
G. Woodward, H. Anderson (2009)
Does beta react to market conditions? Estimates of ‘bull’ and ‘bear’ betas using a nonlinear market model with an endogenous threshold parameterQuantitative Finance, 9
Chris Brooks, Ó. Henry (2002)
The Impact of News on Measures of Undiversifiable Risk: Evidence from the UK Stock MarketCapital Markets: Market Efficiency
Dimitrios Koutmos (2011)
Time-varying beta risk, volatility persistence and the asymmetric impact of news: evidence from industry portfoliosGlobal Business and Economics Review, 13
Pierre Perron (1997)
Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables.Journal of Econometrics, 80
(2015)
About QSE
A. Marshall, T. Maulana, Leilei Tang (2009)
The estimation and determinants of emerging market country risk and the dynamic conditional correlation GARCH modelInternational Review of Financial Analysis, 18
Die Wan, K. Cheng, Xiaoguang Yang (2014)
The reverse volatility asymmetry in Chinese financial marketApplied Financial Economics, 24
C. Krishnamurti, G. Tian, Min Xu, Guangchuan Li (2012)
No news is not good news: evidence from the intra-day return volatility–volume relationship in Shanghai Stock ExchangeJournal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 18
R. Friedmann, Walter Sanddorf-Koehle (2002)
Volatility clustering and nontrading days in Chinese stock marketsJournal of Economics and Business, 54
F. Diebold, Steve Lim, C. Lee (1993)
A Note on Conditional Heteroskedasticity in the Market ModelJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8
Young-Hye Cho, R. Engle (1999)
Time-Varying Betas and Asymmetric Effect of News: Empirical Analysis of Blue Chip StocksFEN: Behavioral Finance (Topic)
T. Bollerslev, Julia Litvinova, George Tauchen (2005)
Leverage and Volatility Feedback Effects in High-Frequency DataCapital Markets: Market Microstructure
Mohammad Najand, John Griffith, David Marlett (2005)
Do life insurance stocks provide superior returns?Journal of Asset Management, 8
(1990)
use the GARCH (1,1) to estimate the conditional variance series
J. Campbell, Ludger Hentschel (1991)
No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock ReturnsEconometrics eJournal
W. Sharpe (1964)
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*Journal of Finance, 19
L. Glosten, R. Jagannathan, D. Runkle (1993)
On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on StocksJournal of Finance, 48
K. French, G. Schwert, R. Stambaugh (1987)
Expected stock returns and volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 19
Farooq Malik (2011)
Estimating the impact of good news on stock market volatilityApplied Financial Economics, 21
R. Brooks, R. Faff, M. Mckenzie (1998)
Time‐Varying Beta Risk of Australian Industry Portfolios: A Comparison of Modelling TechniquesAustralian Journal of Management, 23
(2015)
Petroleum and other liquids
Anders Johansson (2009)
Stochastic volatility and time-varying country risk in emerging marketsThe European Journal of Finance, 15
R. Engle, Andrew Patton (2001)
What good is a volatility model?Quantitative Finance, 1
(2002)
Capital asset pricing model, bear, usual and bull market conditions and beta instability: A value-at-risk approach
T. Bos, P. Newbold (1984)
An Empirical Investigation of the Possibility of Stochastic Systematic Risk in the Market ModelThe Journal of Business, 57
G. Koutmos, Unro Lee, Panayiotis Theodossiu (1994)
Time-varying betas and volatility persistence in International Stock marketsJournal of Economics and Business, 46
M. Reyes (1999)
Size, time-varying beta, and conditional heteroscedasticity in UK stock returnsReview of Financial Economics, 8
T. Bollerslev (1986)
Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 31
(2015)
Lending, investments, capital markets, and technical assistance
R. Bhardwaj, L. Brooks (1993)
Dual Betas from Bull and Bear Markets: Reversal of the Size EffectJournal of Financial Research, 16
The modified model ignores the asymmetric volatility of sector returns. We acknowledge this fact, and we consider it as a limitation to our work
R. Faff, D. Hillier, J. Hillier (2000)
Time Varying Beta Risk: An Analysis of Alternative Modelling TechniquesJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27
Frank Fabozzi, Jack Francis (1978)
Beta as a Random CoefficientJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13
This study examines the impact of market-wide volatility on time-varying risk using the heteroscedastic market model with EGARCH (1,1) specification. Using daily sector returns from the Qatar Stock Exchange (QSE) market over the period 2007–2015, we find that in terms of systematic risk, the large sectors are as vulnerable to overall market volatility as the small ones. In addition, the results reveal evidence for asymmetry in time-varying risk due to the impact of market-wide shocks on sector returns. Specifically, we find that market-wide upswings reduce the systematic risk for industrials, while market-wide downswings increase the systematic risk for real estate, telecommunication and transportation. Our modified model survives a battery of robustness checks.
Journal of Emerging Market Finance – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2018
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.