Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jill Klein, N. Smith, Andrew John (2004)
Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott ParticipationJournal of Marketing, 68
(1998)
The Process of Social Identification: With What Do We Identify
J. Margolis, J. Walsh (2003)
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by BusinessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 48
M. Strahilevitz, J. Myers (1998)
Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to SellMKTG: Affect & Emotion (Topic)
M. Drumwright (1996)
Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic CriteriaJournal of Marketing, 60
(1998)
Individuals’ Need for Organizational Identification (nOID): Speculations on Individual Differences in the Propensity to Identify,
(1998)
Becoming: How Does the Process of Identification Unfold?
P. Kotler, A. Andreasen (1985)
Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations
W. Grassl (2000)
Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity.Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17
C. Bhattacharya, Sankar Sen (2003)
Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with CompaniesJournal of Marketing, 67
D. Kenny, D. Kashy, N. Bolger (1998)
Data analysis in social psychology.
Ida Berger, P. Cunningham, M. Drumwright (2004)
Social Alliances: Company/Nonprofit CollaborationCalifornia Management Review, 47
(2001)
Ethical Issues in Social Alliances,
M. Drumwright, P. Murphy (2001)
Corporate Societal Marketing
(2004)
Corporate America’s Social Conscience,
(1998)
A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Consumer Brand Relationships: The Differential Impact of Relationship Dimensions on Evaluative Relationship Outcomes,
Sankar Sen, C. Bhattacharya (2001)
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social ResponsibilityJournal of Marketing Research, 38
T. Brown, Peter Dacin (1997)
The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product ResponsesJournal of Marketing, 61
J. Dutton, J. Dukerich, Celia Harquail (1994)
Organizational images and member identification.Administrative Science Quarterly, 39
N. Smith (2003)
Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?California Management Review, 45
Michael Tsiros, Carrie Heilman (2005)
The Effect of Expiration Dates and Perceived Risk on Purchasing Behavior in Grocery Store Perishable CategoriesJournal of Marketing, 69
(2002)
The Collaboration Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
David Hess, Nikolai Rogovsky, Thomas Dunfee (2002)
The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social InitiativesCalifornia Management Review, 44
M. Bergami, R. Bagozzi (2000)
Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization.The British journal of social psychology, 39 Pt 4
C. Bhattacharya, H. Rao, M. Glynn (1995)
Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of its Correlates among Art Museum Members:Journal of Marketing, 59
D. Aaker (1995)
Building Strong Brands
A. Standen (1957)
Causes and Effects.Science, 125 3253
Daniel Katz (1955)
Handbook of Social Psychology.Psychological Bulletin
Both theory and recent research evidence suggest that a corporation's socially responsible behavior can positively affect consumers’ attitudes toward the corporation. The effect occurs both directly and indirectly through the behavior's effect on customer–corporation identification. The authors report the results of four studies designed to replicate and extend these findings. Using a field survey design, Study 1 provides evidence that perceived corporate social responsibility affects not only customer purchase behavior through customer–corporate identification but also customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofit organizations. Using experimental designs, Studies 2 and 3 replicate and extend the Study 1 findings by providing additional evidence for the mediating role of customer–corporate identification on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and customer donations. However, the combined results of Studies 2 and 3 also show that because of a “perceived opportunity to do good” by supporting a company that is changing its ways, consumers are more likely to donate to a corporate-supported nonprofit when the corporation has a weaker historical record of socially responsible behavior. Finally, Study 4 tests the relationship between the nonprofit domain and the domain of the corporation's socially responsible behavior as a boundary condition for this effect.
Journal of Marketing – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.