Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Riepe (1992)
An Inquiry into the GoodInternational Studies in Philosophy, 24
W. Condon (2013)
An Analysis of Behavioral OrganizationSign Language Studies, 13
J. Lave, E. Wenger (1991)
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
(1996)
Knowledge Enablers—Facilitate Organizational Relationships: On Care and Indwelling
西田 幾多郎, 上智大学, D. Dilworth (1970)
Fundamental problems of philosophy : the world of action and the dialectical world
J. Brown, P. Duguid (1998)
Organizing KnowledgeCalifornia Management Review, 40
M. Meehan (1976)
Creativity: The Magic SynthesisJAMA, 236
(1995)
Intellectualizing Capability
(1995)
Ba-Principle: New Logic for the Real-Time Emergence of Information
F. Sontag (1983)
Wholeness and the Implicate OrderInternational Studies in Philosophy, 15
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
I. Nonaka, P. Byosiere, Chester Borucki, N. Konno (1994)
Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive testInternational Business Review, 3
Spring 1998 | V ol.40, No.3 | REPRINT SERIES California Review Management The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation Ikujiro Nonaka Noboru Konno © 1998 by The Regents of the University of California The Concept of “Ba”: BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION Ikujiro Nonaka Noboru Konno he management of knowledge has become a frequently discussed topic in the management literature. What are the fundamental condi- tions for knowledge creation? Where is knowledge creation located? T Is it possible to actually manage knowledge like other resources? To address these questions we introduce the Japanese concept of “ba,” which roughly translates into the English word “place.” The concept of ba was originally proposed by the Japanese philosopher Kitaro Nishida and was further developed by Shimizu. Although our concept of ba draws extensively from these works, we have adapted it for the purpose of elaborating our model of knowledge creation. For those unfamiliar with the concept, ba can be thought of as a shared space for emerging relationships. This space can be physical (e.g., office, dispersed business space), virtual (e.g., e-mail, teleconference), mental (e.g., shared experiences, ideas, ideals), or any combina- tion of them. What differentiates ba from
California Management Review – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.