Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Aaheim, Camilla Bretteville (2000)
Emission reductions in EU countries
U. Collier (1996)
The European Union's climate change policy: Limiting emissions or limiting powers?Journal of European Public Policy, 3
A. Dahl (1999)
Competence and Subsidiarity Perspectives in EU Climate Change Policy: From Harmonisation to Differentiation?Energy & Environment, 10
Janne Matláry (1997)
Energy policy in the European Union
L. Ringius (1999)
Differentiation, Leaders, and Fairness: Negotiating Climate Commitments in the European CommunityInternational Negotiation, 4
T. Barker, T. Kram, S. Oberthür, M. Voogt (2001)
The Role of EU Internal Policies in Implementing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options to Achieve Kyoto TargetsInternational Environmental Agreements, 1
W. Schoett (1996)
Climate Protection in Germany
S. Oberthür, Hermann Ott (1999)
The Kyoto Protocol
L. Ross (1988)
Environmental policy in China
The European Union is a key actor in international efforts to build an effective response to the challenge of global climate change. After the US, it is the second biggest emitter of greenhouse gases. In the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the EU committed itself to an 8% reduction of a basket of greenhouse gases. However, EU climate policy so far must be characterised as more of a failure than a success. Not least worrisome, EU officials have recently projected that EU greenhouse gas emissions will increase 6–8% by the end of this decade. In light of the Kyoto commitments and EU climate policy ambitions, what is most probable – comforting emission cuts or embarrassing increases? What are the main, determining factors? On the basis of a summary and review of important developments and achievements in EU climate policy, including the more recent, post-Kyoto developments, the central discussion of key future perspectives are carried out; distinguishing between national, EU–level and global “lenses”. Domestic progress so far makes it tempting to adopt a pessimistic position. But complexity is very high and simple and sweeping assessments and answers should be treated with every bit of caution and suspicion.
Energy & Environment – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.