Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Techniques to Identify Themes

Techniques to Identify Themes Theme identification is one of the most fundamental tasks in qualitative research. It also is one of the most mysterious. Explicit descriptions of theme discovery are rarely found in articles and reports, and when they are, they are often relegated to appendices or footnotes. Techniques are shared among small groups of social scientists, but sharing is impeded by disciplinary or epistemological boundaries. The techniques described here are drawn from across epistemological and disciplinary boundaries. They include both observational and manipulative techniques and range from quick word counts to laborious, in-depth, line-by-line scrutiny. Techniques are compared on six dimensions: (1) appropriateness for data types, (2) required labor, (3) required expertise, (4) stage of analysis, (5) number and types of themes to be generated, and (6) issues of reliability and validity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Field Methods: (Formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) SAGE

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/techniques-to-identify-themes-OzUlI8azLs

References (94)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
1525-822X
eISSN
1552-3969
DOI
10.1177/1525822X02239569
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Theme identification is one of the most fundamental tasks in qualitative research. It also is one of the most mysterious. Explicit descriptions of theme discovery are rarely found in articles and reports, and when they are, they are often relegated to appendices or footnotes. Techniques are shared among small groups of social scientists, but sharing is impeded by disciplinary or epistemological boundaries. The techniques described here are drawn from across epistemological and disciplinary boundaries. They include both observational and manipulative techniques and range from quick word counts to laborious, in-depth, line-by-line scrutiny. Techniques are compared on six dimensions: (1) appropriateness for data types, (2) required labor, (3) required expertise, (4) stage of analysis, (5) number and types of themes to be generated, and (6) issues of reliability and validity.

Journal

Field Methods: (Formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods)SAGE

Published: Feb 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.