Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kruschke (2010)
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysisTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 14
C. Lunghi, M. Morrone (2013)
Early interaction between vision and touch during binocular rivalry.Multisensory research, 26 3
Lisandro Kaunitz, A. Fracasso, A. Lingnau, D. Melcher (2013)
Non-Conscious Processing of Motion Coherence Can Boost Conscious AccessPLoS ONE, 8
S. Tyll, B. Bonath, M. Schoenfeld, H. Heinze, F. Ohl, T. Noesselt (2013)
Neural basis of multisensory looming signalsNeuroImage, 65
Jeffrey Rouder, R. Morey, P. Speckman, Jordan Province (2012)
Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 56
Ophelia Deroy, Yi-Chuan Chen, C. Spence (2014)
Multisensory constraints on awarenessPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369
John Neuhoff (1998)
Perceptual bias for rising tonesNature, 395
T. Stein, M. Hebart, P. Sterzer (2011)
Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5
M. Fahle (1982)
Cooperation between different spatial frequencies in binocular rivalryBiological Cybernetics, 44
John Neuhoff (2001)
An Adaptive Bias in the Perception of Looming Auditory MotionEcological Psychology, 13
(2005)
Perceptual synergy between seeing and hearing revealed during binocular rivalry
A. Alsius, K. Munhall (2013)
Detection of Audiovisual Speech Correspondences Without Visual AwarenessPsychological Science, 24
J. Kruschke (2010)
Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGSEurope’s Journal of Psychology, 7
J. Peirce (2007)
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in PythonJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 162
HighWire Press
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Joost Maier, John Neuhoff, N. Logothetis, A. Ghazanfar (2004)
Multisensory Integration of Looming Signals by Rhesus MonkeysNeuron, 43
E. Wagenmakers (2007)
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp valuesPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14
R. Ee, Jeroen Boxtel, A. Parker, D. Alais (2009)
Multisensory Congruency as a Mechanism for Attentional Control over Perceptual SelectionThe Journal of Neuroscience, 29
G. Maehara, Pi-Chun Huang, R. Hess (2009)
Importance of phase alignment for interocular suppressionVision Research, 49
C. Paffen, D. Alais, Frans Verstraten (2006)
Attention Speeds Binocular RivalryPsychological Science, 17
Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez, L. Ortega, M. Grabowecky, Julia Mossbridge, Satoru Suzuki (2012)
Interactive Coding of Visual Spatial Frequency and Auditory Amplitude-Modulation RateCurrent Biology, 22
D. Alais, J. Boxtel, A. Parker, R. Ee (2010)
Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalryVision Research, 50
T. Stein, P. Sterzer (2014)
Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measureFrontiers in Psychology, 5
T. Andrews (2001)
Binocular rivalry and visual awarenessTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 5
R. Stevenson, Marisa Geoghegan, T. James (2007)
Superadditive BOLD activation in superior temporal sulcus with threshold non-speech objectsExperimental Brain Research, 179
F. Tong, M. Meng, R. Blake (2006)
Neural bases of binocular rivalryTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 10
R. Blake, N. Logothetis (2002)
Visual competitionNature Reviews Neuroscience, 3
(1998)
Single units and conscious vision . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
W. Schiff, James Caviness, J. Gibson (1962)
Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming"Science, 136
Yi Jiang, P. Costello, Sheng He (2007)
Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular SuppressionPsychological Science, 18
Jacob Cohen (1969)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design
Pieter Moors, J. Wagemans, Lee de-Wit (2014)
Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic AdaptationPLoS ONE, 9
Yi-Chuan Chen, Su-Ling Yeh, C. Spence (2011)
Crossmodal Constraints on Human Perceptual Awareness: Auditory Semantic Modulation of Binocular RivalryFrontiers in Psychology, 2
Adrien Chopin, P. Mamassian (2012)
Predictive Properties of Visual AdaptationCurrent Biology, 22
A. Kolmogorov, Nathan Morrison, A. Bharucha-Reid
Theory of ProbabilityNature, 124
M. Meng, F. Tong (2004)
Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.Journal of vision, 4 7
A. Ghazanfar, John Neuhoff, N. Logothetis (2002)
Auditory looming perception in rhesus monkeysProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99
Paola Binda, C. Lunghi, C. Morrone (2010)
Touch disambiguates rivalrous perception at early stages of visual analysisCurrent Biology, 20
Naotsugu Tsuchiya, C. Koch, L. Gilroy, R. Blake (2006)
Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry.Journal of vision, 6 10
Yung-Hao Yang, Su-Ling Yeh (2014)
Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency mattersExperimental Brain Research, 232
Jeffrey Rouder, P. Speckman, Dongchu Sun, R. Morey, G. Iverson (2009)
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesisPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16
C. Lunghi, D. Alais (2013)
Touch Interacts with Vision during Binocular Rivalry with a Tight Orientation TuningPLoS ONE, 8
Verena Conrad, A. Bartels, M. Kleiner, U. Noppeney (2010)
Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry.Journal of vision, 10 10
J. Peirce (2008)
Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPyFrontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2
Eunice Yang, R. Blake (2012)
Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.Journal of vision, 12 3
C. Cappe, A. Thelen, V. Romei, G. Thut, M. Murray (2012)
Looming Signals Reveal Synergistic Principles of Multisensory IntegrationThe Journal of Neuroscience, 32
R. Fox, F. Rasche (1969)
Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibitionPerception & Psychophysics, 5
K. Dent, G. Humphreys (2011)
Neuropsychological evidence for a competitive bias against contracting stimuliNeurocase, 17
J. Plass, Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez, L. Ortega, M. Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki (2014)
Lip Reading Without AwarenessPsychological Science, 25
H. Fotowat, F. Gabbiani (2011)
Collision detection as a model for sensory-motor integration.Annual review of neuroscience, 34
A. Watson, D. Pelli (1983)
Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric methodPerception & Psychophysics, 33
R. Stevenson, T. James (2009)
Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: Inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognitionNeuroImage, 44
D. Alais, A. Parker (2011)
Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differencesFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6
Surya Gayet, S. Stigchel, C. Paffen (2014)
Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefieldFrontiers in Psychology, 5
D. Bach, John Neuhoff, W. Perrig, E. Seifritz (2009)
Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 74 1
Naotsugu Tsuchiya, C. Koch (2005)
Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimagesNature Neuroscience, 8
R. Salomon, M. Lim, B. Herbelin, G. Hesselmann, O. Blanke (2013)
Posing for awareness: proprioception modulates access to visual consciousness in a continuous flash suppression task.Journal of vision, 13 7
S. Hong, R. Blake (2009)
Interocular suppression differentially affects achromatic and chromatic mechanismsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71
T. Ooi, Zijiang He (1999)
Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of AttentionPerception, 28
Wen Zhou, Xiaomeng Zhang, Jennifer Chen, Li Wang, Denise Chen (2012)
Nostril-Specific Olfactory Modulation of Visual Perception in Binocular RivalryThe Journal of Neuroscience, 32
Wen Zhou, Yi Jiang, Sheng He, Denise Chen (2010)
Olfaction Modulates Visual Perception in Binocular RivalryCurrent Biology, 20
A. Parker, D. Alais (2007)
A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalryVision Research, 47
K. Button, J. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, Brian Nosek, J. Flint, E. Robinson, M. Munafo (2013)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscienceNature Reviews Neuroscience, 14
R. Ee, L. Dam, G. Brouwer (2005)
Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stabilityVision Research, 45
Onno Groen, Erik Burg, C. Lunghi, D. Alais (2013)
Touch Influences Visual Perception with a Tight Orientation-TuningPLoS ONE, 8
J. Kruschke (2010)
Doing Bayesian Data Analysis
Verena Conrad, M. Kleiner, A. Bartels, Jessica O'Brien, H. Bülthoff, U. Noppeney (2013)
Naturalistic Stimulus Structure Determines the Integration of Audiovisual Looming Signals in Binocular RivalryPLoS ONE, 8
N. Logothetis (1998)
Single units and conscious vision.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 353 1377
Eunice Yang, R. Blake, J. Mcdonald (2010)
A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 51 1
C. Lunghi, M. Morrone, D. Alais (2014)
Auditory and Tactile Signals Combine to Influence Vision during Binocular RivalryThe Journal of Neuroscience, 34
Terry Palmer, A. Ramsey (2012)
The function of consciousness in multisensory integrationCognition, 125
Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS.
i-Perception – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2015
Keywords: binocular rivalry,continuous flash suppression,interocular suppression,audiovisual integration,audiovisual looming,multisensory integration,visual awareness
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.