Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Dalton, I. Kesner (1987)
Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: An International PerspectiveJournal of International Business Studies, 18
R. Cyert, J. March (1964)
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Shorey Peterson, A. Berle, G. Means (1933)
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28
Paula Rechner, D. Dalton (1991)
CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysisSouthern Medical Journal, 12
G. Whittington, A. Berle, G. Means (1934)
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.Economica, 80
Outsider versus insider boards revisited: a new look at performance and board composition
(1988)
Eighth Annual Survey of Boards of Directors in Australia
P. Blau (1964)
Exchange and Power in Social Life
I. Kesner, D. Dalton (1986)
Boards of directors and the checks and (Im)balances of corporate governanceBusiness Horizons, 29
R. Tricker (1984)
Corporate Governance: Practices, Procedures, and Powers in British Companies and Their Boards of Directors
L. Donaldson (1985)
In defence of organization theory : a reply to the critics
Paula Rechner, D. Dalton (1989)
The Impact of CEO as Board Chairperson on Corporate Performance: Evidence vs. RhetoricAcademy of Management Executive, 3
D. Mcgregor (1960)
The human side of enterprise, New York (McGraw-Hill Book Company) 1960.
E. Fama, M. Jensen (1983)
Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 26
Robert Davis, D. Mcclelland (1962)
The Achieving SocietyTechnology and Culture, 3
S. Zahra, J. Pearce (1989)
Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative ModelJournal of Management, 15
(1978)
CEO and Board Chairman: A Quantitative Study of Dual v
J. Pratt, R. Zeckhauser (1990)
Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business
(1979)
Rights and production functions: an application to Labormanaged firms
Kenneth Albert (1983)
The Strategic Management Handbook
L. Donaldson (1990)
A Rational Basis for Criticisms of Organizational Economics: A Reply to BarneyAcademy of Management Review, 15
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
D. Mcgregor (1960)
The Human Side of Enterprise
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Agency Theory: An Assessment and ReviewAcademy of Management Review, 14
W. Scott (1971)
The Theory of OrganisationsSociology, 5
S. Vance (1978)
Corporate governance: Assessing corporate performance by boardroom attributesJournal of Business Research, 6
(1988)
Board composition and organizational performance: a longitudinal assessment, Paper presented to the Academy of Management
G. Stigler, C. Friedland (1983)
The Literature of Economics: The Case of Berle and MeansThe Journal of Law and Economics, 26
B. Pym, Amitai Etzioni (1977)
A Comparative Analysis of Complex OrganisationsBritish Journal of Sociology, 28
P. Fricke, Amitai Etzioni (1962)
A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 7
F. Herzberg, B. Mausner, B. Snyderman (1960)
The motivation to work
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
E. Johnsen (1964)
Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s.Ledelse and Erhvervsøkonomi, 28
C. Giroux (1960)
The Motivation to work, by F. Herzberg, B. Mausner and B.-C. Snyderman, John Wiley & Sons, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1959.Relations Industrielles-industrial Relations, 15
Donaldson & Davis: STEWARDSHIP THEORY
Paolo Leon (1986)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismThe Antitrust Bulletin, 31
(1983)
The PIMS program
L. Donaldson (1990)
The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 15
Rita Kosnik (1987)
Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate GovernanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
J. Barney (1990)
The Debate Between Traditional Management Theory and Organizational Economics: Substantive Differences or Intergroup Conflict?Academy of Management Review, 15
(1985)
Working relationships between the Chairman of the Boards of Directors and the CEO
Agency theory argues that shareholder interests require protection by separation of incumbency of rôles of board chair and CEO. Stewardship theory argues shareholder interests are maximised by shared incumbency of these rôles. Results of an empirical test fail to support agency theory and provide some support for stewardship theory.
Australian Journal of Management – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.